yes
On 15/05/2012 8:54 AM, npinski wrote:
That's fine. But i'm not sure I understand...what kind of signature
would the configuration have to have? I assume you are implying the
type of the generic parameter would need to be passed in to the
factory method?
On May 11, 3:45 pm, Krzysztof Koźmic<[email protected]>
wrote:
You can but since c# doesn't support that your factory method would have
to do some reflection.
@K
On 12/05/2012 4:27 AM, npinski wrote:
Hi there,
Is there a way to register a WindsorContainer to resolve a generic
type using a generic factory method?
I know I can do registration like:
Component.For<IMyService>().ImplementedBy<MyServiceImpl>()
and
Component.For<MyObject>().UsingFactoryMethod(MyObjectFactory.Create)
and even
Component.For(typeof(IMyGenericService<>)).ImplementedBy(typeof(MyGenericSe
rviceImpl<>))
what I'm looking for is something like:
Component.For(typeof(MyGenericObject<>)).UsingFactoryMethod(MyGenericObject
Factory.Create<>())
Is there a way to do this in a clean way? I started peripherally
reading about IGenericImplementationMatchingStrategy, and Typed
Factory Facilities, but this seems like overkill for what I'm doing.
The workaround I have right now is to create a wrapper for
MyGenericObject<>, and have an interface for the wrapper, which I can
then register with the aforementioned syntax
Component.For(typeof(IMyGenericService<>)).ImplementedBy(typeof(MyGenericSe
rviceImpl<>))
Thanks in advance, guys!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle
Project Development List" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
