Is there any particular reason for this or is that just lack of resources? Best regards Artur
On Aug 6, 10:16 pm, Krzysztof Kozmic <[email protected]> wrote: > not anytime soon > > -- > Krzysztof Kozmic > > > > > > > > On Tuesday, 7 August 2012 at 5:40 AM, Artur Dorochowicz wrote: > > Hi group, > > > For some reason I believed that Castle * 3.1 would link to log4net > > 1.2.11. > > I was quite surprised to see that it wasn't. > > > As you probably know the change between log4net 1.2.10 and 1.2.11 > > cannot be done outside of > > projects that use it due to the fact that nuget package for 1.2.11 > > uses binaries with different > > strong name than 1.2.10. > > > Are there any plans for an update to log4net 1.2.11? > > > Best regards > > Artur > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Castle Project Development List" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > > (mailto:[email protected]). > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected] > > (mailto:[email protected]). > > For more options, visit this group > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en.
