What are you referring to here? The only time I mentioned the word migrate was in relation to the wiki, I do think there is a while bunch of useful content on there for Windsor and DP.
If you are referring to the YouTrack issues, migrate isn't the word I would pick. I'm just going to use the special export API to dump the issues as XML and throw them like source code into a Git repo, not doing anything with GitHub Issues. On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 2:23 PM, hammett <hamm...@gmail.com> wrote: > Is it really worth to migrate everything? I'd say that if the effort > is too much, just dont do it. > > On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Jonathon Rossi <j...@jonorossi.com> > wrote: > > Hammett, I'm not sure if you noticed but all of the MonoRail ones are > > MonoRail 2 not MR3, and they were all logged at least 3 years ago. I > think > > all the MR3 ones ended up in GitHub. > > > > We all sort of neglected JIRA a bit when we had it and everything came > over > > as is into YouTrack and built up. It reminds me of how the old castle > forum > > was neglected after we basically used the mailing lists and SO for > > everything, but weren't clear to users that they shouldn't ask new > questions > > there. > > > > The plan is definitely to centralise everything we do on GitHub, and > clean > > up things that aren't providing value. I've got the web site across to GH > > pages, we will have all our issues across there soon, and that just > leaves > > our wiki which I also plan to migrate. > > > > @Hammett and Henry, heads up I'm planning to dump the YouTrack issues and > > throw them into a GitHub repo so we've got them if we (or our users) > want to > > refer to them in the future. I'll put a README on the repo, and would > like > > to redirect issues.castleproject.org there, that should be easy to do > right? > > > > OT: the phoenix framework has a lot of similarities to Nancy, however a > > bunch of interesting looking features, I'll have to take a deeper look to > > see what they are doing. I'm happy to talk about the other topics you > > raised, but I want to keep this thread on topic so I can sort these out > by > > the end of the week. > > > > Jono > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 9:53 AM, hammett <hamm...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> Yeah, if those PR/patches regarding MR were sent to my email directly, > >> I would have given them a look, but so far I wasnt even aware of their > >> existence. If we could centralize things on github, it would be great. > >> > >> I just started playing with phoenix today > >> https://github.com/phoenixframework/phoenix > >> > >> Going a bit offtopic and in a slight rant: I still think there's a big > >> gap in web frameworks all around (ie not only in the .net world). > >> There's an impedance mismatch on apps that only expose endpoints and > >> apps that expose resources/collections/data. An argument can be made > >> that one can view resources/collections as semantic-less endpoints and > >> that's fair. > >> > >> The issue is that MVC doesnt fit well (no hierarchies). GData and > >> OData are good formalizations of these, but we still dont have a > >> programming model that serves this model well. I've attempted to build > >> one with odata extensions for MR, but it's too overwhelming -- esp > >> given that OData was engineering based on RDBMS capabilities and > >> doesnt fit well with aggregate domains and|or document, schemaless > >> stores. > >> > >> That said, I have little incentive to take at stab at this problem in > >> the .net world. As we all know MS sucks the air of the room with their > >> offerings, regardless of its merits. The community in general seems to > >> be content with the status quo, but more importantly, I dont see much > >> learning opportunities. > >> > >> So yes, I can fix bugs thrown at me as long as it doesnt take much of > >> my time. I'd be way more excited to form study groups or a castle-ext > >> focused on non-.net stuff :-) > >> > >> Thanks Jonathon > >> > >> > >> On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 8:58 PM, Jonathon Rossi <j...@jonorossi.com> > >> wrote: > >> > Hey guys, > >> > > >> > tl;dr. do you want any of the remaining issues in YouTrack relogged on > >> > GitHub? (see link below). If so, please relog them before I close them > >> > as > >> > obsolete in a week or so. > >> > > >> > I've been cleaning out the old issues logged on YouTrack in bursts > over > >> > the > >> > last few months and have closed a few hundred as obsolete. However, > I've > >> > kept a bunch of MonoRail and ActiveRecord ones open that had useful > >> > patches, > >> > feature requests and/or were interesting. > >> > > >> > The Castle Project isn't what it was back in 2008, and with the advent > >> > of > >> > DVCS, foundation like groups like the Apache Foundation, Castle > Project > >> > and > >> > Codehaus are being left behind for less formalised organisation using > >> > GitHub > >> > without other complexities for many reasons I don't want to go into. > >> > > >> > What is our position on the projects we maintain. Obviously Castle > Core > >> > (including DynamicProxy) and Windsor (plus a bunch of the facilities) > >> > are > >> > still alive and well maintained. ActiveRecord hasn't seen a lot of > love > >> > lately but it still seems somewhat popular, or at least used by folks > in > >> > production. > >> > > >> > Personally I'm using Nancy for web development and am enjoying that it > >> > feels > >> > a lot like a progression of where MonoRail was many years ago. I don't > >> > have > >> > a problem closing the rest of the issues and stating clearly that > these > >> > two > >> > projects are now mature and non-longer under active development, i.e. > >> > we'll > >> > accept patches and keep them on the CI server but won't be > contributing > >> > any > >> > time unless people step forward. I'd prefer for us as a group to be > >> > clear to > >> > users which projects we are going to spend effort on to avoid issues > >> > like > >> > this one (https://github.com/castleproject/ActiveRecord/issues/1). > >> > > >> > This email is way too long, I know people hate long emails and I > brought > >> > up > >> > a few issues, so lets sort out the first one. If you want to keep any > of > >> > these issues current please relog them in GitHub because I'll close > off > >> > everything else in a week. Then I'm going to dump a readonly copy of > the > >> > YouTrack issues and we'll use GitHub Issues only rather than a mix. > >> > > >> > http://issues.castleproject.org/youtrack/issues?q=State%3A+Open > >> > > >> > Thanks guys > >> > -- > >> > Jono > >> > > >> > -- > >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > >> > Groups > >> > "Castle Project Development List" group. > >> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send > >> > an > >> > email to castle-project-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > >> > To post to this group, send email to > >> > castle-project-devel@googlegroups.com. > >> > Visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel. > >> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Cheers, > >> hammett > >> http://www.d-collab.com/ > >> http://www.hammettblog.com/ > >> > >> -- > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups > >> "Castle Project Development List" group. > >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send > an > >> email to castle-project-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > >> To post to this group, send email to > >> castle-project-devel@googlegroups.com. > >> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel > . > >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Jono > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Castle Project Development List" group. > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > > email to castle-project-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > > To post to this group, send email to > castle-project-devel@googlegroups.com. > > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel. > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > > > -- > Cheers, > hammett > http://www.d-collab.com/ > http://www.hammettblog.com/ > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Castle Project Development List" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to castle-project-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to castle-project-devel@googlegroups.com > . > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- Jono -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to castle-project-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to castle-project-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
