Brilliant, thanks again.

On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 9:07 PM, Ken Egozi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> rev 5309.
> knock yourself out.
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 10:27 PM, Colin Ramsay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
>> Cool, thanks Ken. You're right Ayende, but it's just because ASP.NET has
>> it right there as a property so I assume MR must have it.
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 8:24 PM, Ken Egozi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Same could be said on "AcceptHeader".
>>>
>>> I agree it's kinda useful and I'm actually adding it to IRequest right
>>> now, unless I'll hear strong opinion against that while nant is doing it's
>>> thing.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 10:13 PM, Ayende Rahien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Can't you just access the headers?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 7:51 PM, Colin Ramsay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> Is there any way to get the current useragent without having to go to
>>>>> the UnderlyingContext?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Colin.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Ken Egozi.
>>> http://www.kenegozi.com/blog
>>> http://www.musicglue.com
>>> http://www.castleproject.org
>>> http://www.gotfriends.co.il
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Ken Egozi.
> http://www.kenegozi.com/blog
> http://www.musicglue.com
> http://www.castleproject.org
> http://www.gotfriends.co.il
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Castle Project Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to