Maybe.
Why are you going to all that trouble?
On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 12:19 AM, Troy Gould <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Could I then specify two Interceptors and use the IInterceptorSelector
> on the ProxyGenerationOptions instead of a ProxyGenerationHook to
> switch between a NoOpInterceptor and the Interceptor i'd like to use
> on specific methods?
>
> On Sep 12, 3:13 pm, "Ayende Rahien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > All methods, sorry.
> > When you skip proxying a method, you don't generate that, which is a
> problem
> > when the CLR validates this interface.
> > In other words, this is only useful for classes, not interfaces.
> >
> > On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 12:12 AM, Ayende Rahien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > > If you have an interface, you must implement all items.
> >
> > > On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 12:11 AM, Troy Gould <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > >> I'm a bit confused about IProxyGenerationHook. Maybe I'm not using it
> > >> correctly (there is zero docs on it), or it's not working correctly?
> > >> I'm using 1.0 Release Candidate 3 - September 20, 2007 from the
> > >> download pages.
> >
> > >> I have an Interceptor that I've created. However, I would like the
> > >> Interceptor to only intercept methods with a specific attribute on
> > >> them. I was originally doing all of this from the Interceptor itself,
> > >> but then started looking at the ProxyGenerationOptions class. It
> > >> allows me to specify a IProxyGenerationHook. So, I implemented the
> > >> following class:
> >
> > >> internal class CacheableMethodHook : IProxyGenerationHook
> > >> {
> > >> public bool ShouldInterceptMethod(Type type, MethodInfo
> > >> memberInfo)
> > >> {
> > >> object[] customAttributes =
> > >> memberInfo.GetCustomAttributes(typeof (CacheableAttribute), true);
> > >> return customAttributes.Length > 0;
> > >> }
> >
> > >> public void NonVirtualMemberNotification(Type type, MemberInfo
> > >> memberInfo)
> > >> {
> > >> return;
> > >> }
> >
> > >> public void MethodsInspected()
> > >> {
> > >> return;
> > >> }
> > >> }
> >
> > >> However, what happens is that I get the following:
> > >> Method 'QueryAll' in type
> > >> 'ISiteDaoProxy46feaa53f3264bc2aa67ff254bb0925e' from assembly
> > >> 'DynamicProxyGenAssembly2, Version=0.0.0.0, Culture=neutral,
> > >> PublicKeyToken=null' does not have an implementation.
> >
> > >> When the ShouldInterceptMethod of CacheableMethodHook runs, it does
> > >> return false for the QueryAll method. I was expecting that when it
> > >> returns false, the the Interceptor just calls invocation.Proceed()
> > >> automatically. Is the the intention or have I missed something in the
> > >> use of IProxyGenerationHook?
> >
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Castle Project Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
