Please do On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 10:12 PM, Jason Meckley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> > finally got this working. there where some syntax downgrades required > in InversionOfControl to compile with 2.0. > I also needed to update AR Facility to implement ISession from NH > trunk. > > if others want i can supply a patch. > > On Oct 24, 2:34 pm, Jason Meckley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ok, I'll change my order up. I was doing: > > NH > > Castle > > Rhino > > > > Ayende Rahien wrote: > > > The way I work when I want to do this is by:compiling castle > > > copy castle.core, castle.dynamicproxy2 to nh's sharedlibs > > > compiling nhibernate > > > compiling the nhibernate dlls to castle shared libs > > > compiling castle > > > compiling castle libs to rhino shared libs > > > compile rhino > > > > > On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 7:53 PM, Jason Meckley <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >wrote: > > > > > > looking into Rhino BuildFromTrunk.build I need to update SVN, so I'm > > > > updating to 1.5.4. I'll get there eventually:) > > > > > > On Oct 24, 1:33 pm, Jason Meckley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > no I don't think so. I don't see any files castle that say > build-from- > > > > > trunk. if you're talking rhino, then no I'm not there yet. > > > > > I output the log to a text file. come to find out the projects are > not > > > > > compiling correctly, seems to be a 3.0 > syntax errors. I'm > updating > > > > > nant to target 3.5 instead of 2.0. > > > > > > > Off topic a little bit, but 3.5 compilation for 2.0 is confusing > with > > > > > nant. If the code uses a 3.0 > feature and is compiled using 3.5 > > > > > framework can I then use that assembly in a 2.0 project? For > example, > > > > > NH required the 3.5 framework to compile, but runs on 2.0. Why use > 3.5 > > > > > if you're targeting 2.0? is the same true for castle? > > > > > > > Ok, just found out: > > > > > "C:\Program Files\nant\nant-0.86-nightly-2008-08-18\bin\nant" - > > > > > t:net-3.5 -f:release.build package-net-2.0 %* >ouptput-release- > > > > > build.log > > > > > doesn't compile with errors about var being undefined. I know that > > > > > one. > > > > > > > On Oct 24, 1:16 pm, Ayende Rahien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Are you running build-from-trunk? > > > > > > > > On Oct 24, 5:05 pm, Jason Meckley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > I downloaded the trunk this morning to build with the latest NH > trunk > > > > > > > (which will make it's way into Rhino.Tools). > > > > > > > > > I have the build running successfully with tests. (required a > > > > previous > > > > > > > version of AllComponentsReleasePolicy.cs to be 2.0 compatible.) > So > > > > > > > it's successful in building part of the stack but not the > entire > > > > > > > stack. It's not building > > > > > > > AR, Facilities or MR. > > > > > > > > > I modified the release.cmd to this > > > > > > > @echo off > > > > > > > "C:\Program Files\nant\nant-0.86-nightly-2008-08-18\bin\nant" - > > > > > > > t:net-2.0 -f:release.build package-net-2.0 %* > > > > > > > "C:\Program Files\nant\nant-0.86-nightly-2008-08-18\bin\nant" > rebuild > > > > > > > > > it runs without error, to the best of my knowledge, but the > debug and > > > > > > > release build directories only contain assemblies for: > > > > > > > Core > > > > > > > DynamicProxy > > > > > > > DynamicProxy2 > > > > > > > Services.Logging > > > > > > > Services.Transaction > > > > > > > other 3rd party assemblies. > > > > > > > > > How can I adjust by command above to also build ActiveRecord, > > > > > > > Facilities and the associated tests? MR isn't required at this > point. > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
