This is issue is raised usually. Maybe it would be good to implement DP to
copy the attributes on the target?
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 9:26 PM, James Thigpen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
> Hello All,
>
> I have a set of classes that perform tasks decorated with attributes
> that designate the textual command a legacy client sends over a
> network connection
>
> [Handles("FOOCMD")]
> public class FooMessageHandler...
>
> [Handles("BARCMD")]
> public class BarMessageHandler...
>
> And I have a class which takes an array of these as constructor bound
> dependencies injected into it. When it receives a command, it
> reflects over the array of message handlers to select the correct one.
>
> This was working fine until I started using the Automatic Transaction
> Management facility and needed to mark a couple of these message
> handlers as Transactional. The proxies generated don't seem to
> maintain the HandlesAttribute from the original classes so when it
> reflects over them it can't find the correct message handler.
>
> It made me realize there was probably some SRP violations going on
> here that my message handlers needed to be transactional, and I'll
> probably end up fixing it that way, but I'd still like to know if
> there's any way to make the attributes appear on the generated
> proxies. I couldn't find any answers via google.
>
> Thank you,
>
> James Thigpen
> >
>
--
Tuna Toksöz
Typos included to enhance the readers attention!
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Castle Project Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
