That's the version this project uses. If necessary, I'll use the
trunk, but I'd rather stick with the current version.

On Nov 21, 7:01 pm, "Ken Egozi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> why would you want to use RC3?
>
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 6:59 PM, shovavnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Thanks for the quick reply!
>
> > Is there an equivalent in RC3?
> > Doesn't the syntax I used have the same meaning?
>
> > On Nov 21, 6:29 pm, "Tiago Soczek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Try register the components with this syntax
>
> > > container.Register(
> > > Component.For<ITestService>().
> > >   ImplementedBy<TestService>(),
> > > Component.For<ITestService1>().
> > >   ImplementedBy<TestService1>()
> > > );
>
> > > On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 2:22 PM, shovavnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > I'm having trouble getting Windsor (and MicroKernel) resolving chained
> > > > constructor dependencies. Am I using the container incorrectly? Is
> > > > this a bug?
>
> > > > For example, this test fails:
>
> > > >                [Test]
> > > >                public void ContainerShouldResolveChainedDependency()
> > > >                {
> > > >                        using(var container = new WindsorContainer())
> > > >                        {
> > > >                                container.AddComponent<ITestService,
> > > > TestService>();
> > > >                                container.AddComponent<ITestService1,
> > > > TestService1>();
>
> > > >  Assert.That(container.Resolve<ITestService1>(), Is.Not.Null); //
> > > > this fails
> > > >                        }
> > > >                }
>
> > > > Here's the code for the test services. Note that TestService1 defines
> > > > a constructor dependency for ITestService.
>
> > > >        public interface ITestService {}
>
> > > >        public class TestService : ITestService {}
>
> > > >        public interface ITestService1 { ITestService Test { get; } }
>
> > > >        public class TestService1 : ITestService1
> > > >        {
> > > >                public ITestService Test { get; private set; }
> > > >                public TestService1(ITestService test) { Test = test; }
> > > >        }
>
> > > > And here's the exception stack trace:
>
> > > > at
>
> > Castle.MicroKernel.ComponentActivator.DefaultComponentActivator.SetUpProperties
> > > > (Object instance, CreationContext context)
> > > > at
>
> > Castle.MicroKernel.ComponentActivator.DefaultComponentActivator.InternalCreate
> > > > (CreationContext context)
> > > > at
> > > > Castle.MicroKernel.ComponentActivator.AbstractComponentActivator.Create
> > > > (CreationContext context)
> > > > at Castle.MicroKernel.Lifestyle.SingletonLifestyleManager.Resolve
> > > > (CreationContext context)
> > > > at Castle.MicroKernel.Handlers.DefaultHandler.Resolve(CreationContext
> > > > context)
> > > > at Castle.MicroKernel.DefaultKernel.ResolveComponent(IHandler handler,
> > > > Type service, IDictionary additionalArguments)
> > > > at Castle.MicroKernel.DefaultKernel.get_Item(Type service)
> > > > at Castle.Windsor.WindsorContainer.Resolve(Type service)
> > > > at Castle.Windsor.WindsorContainer.Resolve[T]()
> > > > at MyTests.ContainerShouldResolveChainedDependency() in
> > > > MyTests.cs:line 62
>
> --
> Ken 
> Egozi.http://www.kenegozi.com/bloghttp://www.delver.comhttp://www.musicglue.comhttp://www.castleproject.orghttp://www.gotfriends.co.il
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Castle Project Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to