Can you repro this on dev machine? On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 1:07 PM, Gildas <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hi Andre, thanks for answering. I did answer minutes ago but it looks > like google did not care... > > We use NH 2nd level cache a lot and the sql server process rarely move > but I must admit I did not check those counters. I'll try that > tomorrow. > > Thanks > > -- > Gildas > > On Feb 20, 6:41 pm, Andre Loker <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > Just a wild guess, maybe there are concurrent database locks that block > > the requests. Have you checked the isolation levels of DB transactions > > and the Windows performance logs (there are some performance counters > > regarding sql server locks). > > > > Regards, > > Andre > > > > > Hi, > > > > > We have a rather complex monorail/activerecord/rhino application. We > > > noticed a very high CPU consumption under heavy load so I tried to > > > make some tests on our development server with wcat. > > > > > When only one user is accessing the application, the CPU stay between > > > 3 or 5%. As soon as another one is accessing the application at the > > > same time, the CPU exceed 90%. We use a lot of viewcomponents which > > > cache their output, so that's should not be the rendering process. > > > > > I suspect a lock or something similar is happening. I tried to find > > > out what using dottrace but every single method take a long time to > > > execute when 2 users are accessing the application. > > > > > Does anybody have any ideas about what to look for ? > > > > > Thanks ! > > > > > -- > > > Gildas > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
