anyway it should not be in the view (NV) imo. that kind of a logic require a controller (either an MR one, or a POCO)
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 1:02 PM, Ken Egozi <[email protected]> wrote: > what about an IHttpHandler to serve the js files? > > /script.ashx?a,b,c,d > > will combine (and compress?) the files, and will only take the ones that > the current user/scenario allow for > > > > On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 12:54 PM, Wayne Douglas <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Hi >> I'm trying to figure out how to secure an online app by only serving the >> JS the user has access to. I.e. - instead of simply disabling/hiding a menu >> button, I'd like the JS that creates that button to never be printed. >> >> I was thinking about setting the *.js files to pass through the monorail >> pipeline and, with some NVelocity logic, limit the JS that actually gets >> sent to the client. >> >> Does anyone know how to do this, if it's been done/is possible or, if >> there's a better way? >> >> I'm using EXTJs/Monorail/NVelocity in a very large/complex application. >> >> >> -- >> Cheers, >> >> w:// >> >> >> >> > > > -- > Ken Egozi. > http://www.kenegozi.com/blog > http://www.delver.com > http://www.musicglue.com > http://www.castleproject.org > http://www.gotfriends.co.il > -- Ken Egozi. http://www.kenegozi.com/blog http://www.delver.com http://www.musicglue.com http://www.castleproject.org http://www.gotfriends.co.il --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
