I'll see if I can add a rest example to the demo in the WCF Facility project over the weekend.
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 2:12 PM, Gabriel Mancini de Campos < [email protected]> wrote: > > Yes, > > So i get the code from MIKE HADLOW in > http://mikehadlow.blogspot.com/2008/11/windsor-wcf-integration.html > , and i try to implements a RESTFULL acess to this services. > but i dont have sucess in this. can u halp me? please??? > > thanks > > > On 20 mar, 15:00, Craig Neuwirt <[email protected]> wrote: > > I believe there are some good examples of using WCF Rest out there. All > the > > WCF Facility will do is help simplify the configuration of those clients > and > > services. Is that the area you need help in? > > > > On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 12:55 PM, Gabriel Mancini de Campos < > > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > if u can, please up this sample... > > > i realy need start in this subject. > > > > > thanks > > > > > On 20 mar, 12:31, Craig Neuwirt <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > No real example. Just some unit tests to test with > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 9:21 AM, Gabriel Mancini de Campos < > > > > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Craig do you have this example ? > > > > > > > WCF+WINDSOR+RESTFULL ??? > > > > > > > On 3 fev, 12:20, Craig Neuwirt <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 4:13 PM, Colin Jack < > [email protected]> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Couple of issues I've observed. > > > > > > > > > The first was that I had my service class had constructor > > > dependencies > > > > > > > that I'd not registered, this was obviously silly of me but > when > > > > > > > debugging all I kept getting was 502s when trying to contact my > > > REST > > > > > > > resources (programatically or using Fiddler) and it took me a > while > > > to > > > > > > > work out the reason. I'm thus thinking that an exception server > > > side > > > > > > > might have been cool, to help point people to the source of the > > > > > > > problem. > > > > > > > > I have added the ability to open service hosts eagerly > > > > > > > > - wcfFacility.Services.OpenServiceHostsEagerly() for all > services > > > > > > - WcfServiceModel.OpenEagerly() for a specific service > > > > > > > > When you do this, the service hosts will be opened immediately > upon > > > > > service > > > > > > registration regardless of whether dependencies are satisfied. > You > > > will > > > > > > then > > > > > > receive a FaultException<ExceptionDetail> if you communicate with > a > > > > > service > > > > > > that has unresolved dependencies. The exception details will > list > > > the > > > > > > unsatissfied > > > > > > dependencies (make sure you have ServiceDebugBehavior with > details > > > turned > > > > > > on). > > > > > > > > > Secondly since I'm building REST resources I'm not interested > in > > > the > > > > > > > service interface that I would be with normal WCF. What I mean > is > > > that > > > > > > > I'd be happy to apply the [ServiceContract] and > [OperationContract] > > > > > > > directly to my service class and not have it implement an > interface > > > > > > > that was tagged up with these attributes. If I do create the > > > interface > > > > > > > then the client will never use it anyway (because if I go down > that > > > > > > > path I'm back to RPC). So I'm wondering if you believe adding > > > better > > > > > > > support for this use case is possible? > > > > > > > > Can you share with me a REST example using this > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
