What I mean by render times; I guess I was a little vague. I mean from the time the user makes a choice to the time the user see the result on there end. So yes windsor will make a difference because performing any action takes time. and if windsor is in the mix there is going to be time it needs to figure out what object is being requested and so on and so forth. and the reason for looking at nhibernate directly as apposed to AR I tend to have a feeling that it will speed up performance because I see AR having more Overhead. now the View I submitted is very simple and even on cassini both engines tested so far seem to be doing very well no noticable time difference. but more over I want to look more at the server what is it doing on there after a million or so sessions and hits to the pages does one tend to eat up memory what does the processor utilization look like what is the maximum number of requests per second each one can process. and with the the time to last byte. all of these things matter for an enterprise application and from what I see MR is more than ready for that I am just looking to get every last millisecond I can free up to give the user a better experience. Terry
---------------------------------------- Return-Path: <grbounce-qg156quaaad3g_8ucrr-gbnnwip8nz2w=tmassey=epiphanygs....@googlegroups.com> Received: from mail-px0-f169.google.com [209.85.216.169] by mx249o.mysite4now.com with SMTP; Thu, 14 May 2009 08:38:07 -0700 Received: by pxi41 with SMTP id 41so544772pxi.31 for <[email protected]>; Thu, 14 May 2009 08:38:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.140.133.10 with SMTP id g10mr407695rvd.8.1242315478211; Thu, 14 May 2009 08:37:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.106.201.4 with SMTP id y4gr9823prf.0; Thu, 14 May 2009 08:37:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.31.202 with SMTP id z10mr63194bkc.26.1242315471621; Thu, 14 May 2009 08:37:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-bw0-f163.google.com (mail-bw0-f163.google.com [209.85.218.163]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id 14si7456bwz.1.2009.05.14.08.37.51; Thu, 14 May 2009 08:37:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-bw0-f163.google.com with SMTP id 7so1301948bwz.36 for <[email protected]>; Thu, 14 May 2009 08:37:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.68.15 with SMTP id t15mr2227476bki.139.1242315471140; Thu, 14 May 2009 08:37:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:x-sender:x-apparently-to :received:received:received-spf:authentication-results:received :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:received :in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:reply-to :sender:precedence:x-google-loop:mailing-list:list-id:list-post :list-help:list-unsubscribe:x-beenthere-env:x-beenthere; bh=76uCDbxwBIYN+4F3k+U8FqFsthZpXwBsbpPwskJhDs0=; b=SwtaVXb0QNYmlTDOk+eu/fd5yy0z89lY/VB3VN4N5SNox26Vn/F3prFFxiEMmPp4Vk SUZB78N53QQVKxGGG67PXoj7t5HeJxm/MZB06KnEH3sPEX/DaNHunwm2gl6/BF0zuAZC w35s41KtKKcKwZkQBEvy4JFbw6CUxpUwdODY0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-sender:x-apparently-to:received-spf:authentication-results :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:reply-to:sender :precedence:x-google-loop:mailing-list:list-id:list-post:list-help :list-unsubscribe:x-beenthere-env:x-beenthere; b=kJU8QBgla5N7jDBa7PD01JqLnjMxGAVEDJDKOYZ312MFHvSKkSl3R0ksIB5G5nj6XU BipRYA9pzWIS71t2UJUIuiCdXITz6KR3eU54dKKWzvfD9vioHAT4jMlLJ1jiRBuuixyh pRUVVz3h/ubGf7fwkjpDF5pl4JakOtblcZ1t8= X-Sender: [email protected] X-Apparently-To: [email protected] Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 209.85.218.163 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) client-ip=209.85.218.163; Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 209.85.218.163 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of [email protected]) [email protected] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: <16ed1637$393c846a$2f9f58...@com> References: <16ed1637$393c846a$2f9f58...@com> From: Colin Ramsay <[email protected]> Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 16:37:31 +0100 Message-ID: <[email protected]> Subject: Re: MR View Engine Comparison To: [email protected] Reply-To: [email protected] Sender: [email protected] Precedence: bulk X-Google-Loop: groups Mailing-List: list [email protected]; contact [email protected] List-Id: <castle-project-users.googlegroups.com> List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]> List-Help: <mailto:[email protected]> List-Unsubscribe: <http://googlegroups.com/group/castle-project-users/subscribe>, <mailto:[email protected]> X-BeenThere-Env: [email protected] X-BeenThere: [email protected] X-Rcpt-To: <[email protected]> X-SmarterMail-Spam: SPF_Pass, DK_Pass X-SmarterMail-TotalSpamWeight: -10 How would Windsor and NHibernate have an effect on rendering times? On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 4:21 PM, Terry Massey wrote: > All, > I am working on the performance testing for the different view engines and > have the NVelocity and Brail views completed and configured. after looking > into the ASPView engine I am going to ask that those who want that one > completed convert the following NVelocity view to ASPView syntax. I am > working on the Spark Right now but I am running into a version issue where > the trunk build of MR and AR I am using to generate the test just is not > compatible. I also Plan on utilizing nhibernate and windsor as a comparison > test as well to see the performance impact they have on render response > times. for ASPView I may also need some assistance in configuration as I > have yet to implement anything with that engine. > > < > > h3>Accounts list > > > Account Code > LevelID > Account Desc > Active > > #foreach($Account in $Accounts) > > $Account.AccountCode > $Account.LEVELID > $Account.AccountDescription > $Account.ACTIVE > > #end > Thanks, > Terry Massey > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > I'm interested as well > > Juan Carlos Seguí > Dpto. I+D+i - CAE, S.A. > > San Francisco de Borja, 18 > 46701 Gandía. Valencia. > > www.cae.net > +34 962 872 010 > > Terry Massey escribió: > > I agree that there isn't much time spent in the view engine but every ms > counts on a enterprise site. when you have complex logic that must occur and > the choice for a view engine is interpreted and takes an extra 10 ms that > could be used else where for more complex logic it is well worth it to > consider this. I have spent too much time on past projects trying to find > ways to enhance performance to find that the big stumbling block was the > backend dll's i had no control over. While MR provides so much more control > over what is rendered and the wonderful end to Viewstate. I still want to > make sure at this point in my project I am picking the best performing tools > for the job. with a balance on the tells and technologies I wish to link up > with and utilize. and the castle project provides that but the View engine > is a plugable piece that I really want to make sure isn't going to be a plug > in the flow. > > I will do something then If any one is interested I will share my results I > will put together a series of simple views reading lists of data from a > single db on a single server and do some benchmark of my own. if interested > I will post my results with the tested views used. I may ask for some help > once I get the NVelocity views complete. to make sure I am utilizing the > other engine syntax correctly. > > I will even create a asp.net webforms to compete it against. if there is > enough interest. > > Please let me know if there is interest in this type of performance data. > > Thanks, > Terry Massey > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
