Yeah, Im sorry I wasnt a bit more diplomatic with asking this ;) Im just under a tight deadline and dont have tome to learn about patching windsor and auto property injection is killing me as far as stitching a part of my app together.
Ive tried alex's suggestion of manually removing property dependencies after registering but for some reason none of the components have any dependencies listed. If anyone has any insight into this im willing to try again otherwise ill post some tests after the deadline. For now im moving to SM for this portion of my app. Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T -----Original Message----- From: Mauricio Scheffer <[email protected]> Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 09:03:49 To: Castle Project Users<[email protected]> Subject: Re: Can you specify that a container should not resolve optional dependencies? Well, you could always send a patch for this ;-) However, I'd try to wrap the 3rd party lib (with adapters/ factories)... it will be ultimately cleaner. Unless you have to write *lots* of wrappers. Also remember this thread: http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel/browse_thread/thread/43aa513817bd057a/553d069ff3352656 On May 18, 1:18 am, George Mauer <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks Mauricio, I had actually forgotten about that post but I was > hoping that something got introduced into the trunk to do this so I > wouldn't have to roll my own. > > On May 17, 11:10 pm, Mauricio Scheffer <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > You already asked that a few months ago at > > stackoverflow...http://stackoverflow.com/questions/178611/ > > Didn't that work out? > > > On May 18, 12:41 am, George Mauer <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I would like to specify that my container should not resolve property/ > > > optional dependencies. > > > > I do not have control over the library in question so I cannot add a > > > DoNotWire attribute to properties, instead I would like to specify > > > this from the container registration (preferably in the fluent > > > registration). > > > > Can I do this on a per-component basis? Can I just specify that I > > > don't want any of the optional dependencies in the container resolved? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
