if the exception was caught at another layer of indirection ;) , what would be the difference? would atf know the exception happened at all?
On Jun 10, 7:20 pm, Germán Schuager <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 6:43 PM, Jan Limpens <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Catching all exceptions will make the transaction try to commit. > > > So the only way to stop a transaction from committing would be to > > actively throw an exception and present it to the user as a rescue? I > > thought, the transaction would have been rolled back, before the > > exception was thrown to me. > > I am quite in a bit of trouble, if this is as you say... > > Just delegate your transaction management to other object other than your > controller; something like this: > > public class XyzController : BaseController > { > private readonly IService service; > > public XyzController(IService service) > { > this.service = service; > } > > public void Index() > { > try > { > service.DoSomething(); > } > catch (SomeException ex) > { > // handle exception > } > } > > } > > [Transactional] > public class Service : IService > { > [Transaction(TransactionMode.Require)] > public void DoSomething() > { > .... > } > > } > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
