cool
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 9:08 AM, Bergius <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Oh, that's nice. Did not know you could do that.
>
> Component.For<ServiceMetadataBehavior>().DependsOn(new
> { HttpGetEnabled = true })
>
> did the trick. Apparently no need for Lifestyle.Transient (it looks
> like WcfFacility takes care of that for any IServiceBehavior
> component).
right, I forget about that :-)
>
>
> Thank you for this much more neat solution.
>
> On Jun 24, 3:56 pm, Craig Neuwirt <[email protected]> wrote:
> > When using fluent config, you rarely need to use parameters since that is
> > geared for config stuff.Use this
> >
> > kernel.Register( Component.For<ServiceMetadataBehavior>()
> > .Lifestyle.Transient
> > .DependsOn(new { HttpGetEnabled = true })
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 8:50 AM, Bergius <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > I'll give it a shot. How would I go about setting the HttpsGetEnabled
> > > property, as Parameters only work with string properties (if I'm not
> > > mistaken)?
> >
> > > On Jun 24, 3:39 pm, Craig Neuwirt <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > Can you try registering it as a transient and see if that resolves
> your
> > > > issue
> > > > Kernel.Register(
> > > > Component.For<ServiceMetadataBehavior>().Lifestyle.Transient )
> >
> > > > On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 8:31 AM, Bergius <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > > > Like this (based on examples such as the WcfIntegration demo):
> >
> > > > > var smb = new ServiceMetadataBehavior { HttpsGetEnabled = true };
> > > > > kernel.Register( Component.For<IServiceBehavior>().Instance( smb )
> );
> >
> > > > > Maybe I could've solved it with ImplementedBy and component
> > > > > parameters?
> >
> > > > > On Jun 24, 3:14 pm, Craig Neuwirt <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > > How was the ServiceMetadataBehavior added when it was mixing the
> > > wsdl?
> >
> > > > > > On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 8:08 AM, Bergius <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > If anyone encounters this problem, the solution that worked for
> me
> > > was
> > > > > > > to create my own ServiceHostFactory (which inherits
> > > > > > > DefaultServiceHostFactory) and add a new
> ServiceMetadataBehavior
> > > > > > > instance per host it creates, instead of registering a single
> > > > > > > ServiceMetadataBehavior instance on the kernel (as per every
> test
> > > and
> > > > > > > example I've found to date).
> >
> > > > > > > If I've missed anything obvious that would have solved the
> problem
> > > > > > > outlined below, do let me know.
> >
> > > > > > > / Bergius
> >
> > > > > > > On Jun 16, 2:36 pm, Bergius <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > > > > Hi all.
> >
> > > > > > > > Environment: IIS 7 and WcfFacility. .svc files are generated
> and
> > > > > > > > services are auto-wired on app start. web.config contains
> zero
> > > > > service/
> > > > > > > > behavior configuration. ServiceMetadataBehavior with
> > > HttpsGetEnabled.
> >
> > > > > > > > My goal: SomeService.svc?wsdlshould publish only information
> > > > > > > > regarding SomeService
> > > > > > > > OR one Service.svc?wsdlshould publish information regarding
> all
> > > > > > > > registered services.
> >
> > > > > > > > The problem/oddness: when app has started, a first request to
> > > > > > > > SomeService.svc?wsdlreveals information only about
> SomeService.
> > > When
> > > > > > > > requesting AnotherService.svc?wsdl, it contains information
> about
> > > > > both
> > > > > > > > SomeService and AnotherService. Refreshing
> > > SomeService.svc?wsdlafter
> > > > > > > > a request to AnotherService also gives me information on both
> > > > > > > > services.
> >
> > > > > > > > Although the services are working, it feels a bit confused.
> I've
> > > > > tried
> > > > > > > > placing my services in different namespaces, but that only
> > > resulted
> > > > > in
> > > > > > > > more complexWSDL. As stated above, I'd like to see metadata
> for
> > > only
> > > > > > > > the service key referenced in the .svc file.
> >
> > > > > > > > Any ideas or pointers? Is this expected behavior, or have I
> done
> > > > > > > > something wrong?
> >
> > > > > > > > I've read the related discussion on programmatical creation
> of
> > > > > > > > IMetadataExchange endpoints and would love to see a follow-up
> on
> > > > > that.
> >
> > > > > > > > / Bergius
> >
> >
> >
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Castle Project Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
