No, not if the connection was provided by NH. In the code example of your initial post, you managed the connection explicitly. Why is it a problem then to pass an open session to DifferentDatabaseScope?
-Markus 2009/8/11 EricP <[email protected]> > > Another approach I tried was getting connection directly from > ActiveRecord using code: > > =========== > using (var sessionScope = new SessionScope()) > { > IDbConnection cn = > ActiveRecordMediator.GetSessionFactoryHolder() > > .CreateSession(typeof(object)) > > .Connection; > > Assert.AreEqual(cn.State, > ConnectionState.Open); > > ============ > > > But once again the connection returned by CreateSession(typeof > (object)).Connection is Open. Is there a way to get a connection from > AR without it being Open. > > Eric > > On Aug 7, 3:20 pm, EricP <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thank you for suggestion. > > > > I tried out DifferentDatabaseScope and it does seem to work. I did > > find an issue. DifferentDatabaseScope seems to require an open > > connection. > > > > I wrote a simple test: > > > > ====================================== > > public void DifferentDatabaseScope_Requires_Open_Connection() > > { > > IDbConnection cn = XConnectionFactory.GetCn(); //Not opened > > > > using (new DifferentDatabaseScope(cn)) > > { > > var Customer = new Customer(...); > > customer.Save(); //Get exceptioin > > } > > > > } > > > > =================================== > > > > On the line with "customer.Save()" - there is exception: > > System.InvalidOperationException: ExecuteReader requires an open and > > available Connection. The connection's current state is closed. > > > > Since I use SessionScope per HTTP request approach, I think it would > > be better not to keep the connection open during the duration of the > > Http Request. SessionScope seems to only open the connection when it > > is needed. Is there a way to use DifferentDatabaseScope in the same > > way? > > > > Eric > > > > On Aug 6, 11:44 pm, Mauricio Scheffer <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > Take a look at DifferentDatabaseScope. > > > > > Here's the testcase for reference: > https://svn.castleproject.org/svn/castle/trunk/ActiveRecord/Castle.Ac... > > > > > On Aug 6, 10:43 pm, EricP <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > In my project we have some older modules written using straight > > > > ADO.NET <http://ado.net/> and some newer modules that use Castle > Active Record. In > > > > several places where ADO.NET <http://ado.net/> code and NHibernate > code are used in the > > > > same TransactionScope - I started getting errors that MSDTC is not > > > > available. > > > > > > Here is the sample code that results in exception: > > > > > > =========================== > > > > > > using (var scope=System.Transactions.TransactionScope()) > > > > { > > > > > > using(var connection = new SqlConnection(connectionString)) > > > > { > > > > cn.Open(); > > > > > > //Make some changes using ADO.NET <http://ado.net/> > > > > string insertQuery = @"insert into employee ...."; > > > > SqlCommand cmd = new SqlCommand(insertQuery, cn); > > > > cmd.ExecuteNonQuery(); > > > > > > // Make some changes using AR session > > > > using (new SessionScope()) //Need to pass cn in here > somehow > > > > { > > > > var Customer = new Customer(...); > > > > customer.Save(); //Get exception that "MSDTC > on > > > > server '...' is unavailable." > > > > } > > > > > > } > > > > > > scope.Complete(); > > > > > > } > > > > > > =================== > > > > > > This occurs because ADO.NET <http://ado.net/> code is using one > connection, while > > > > ActiveRecord creates another one. > > > > If I used NHibernate directly I could probably call > > > > SessionFactory.OpenSession(cn); with my ADO.NET > > > > <http://ado.net/>connection to get > > > > around MSDTC issue. > > > > > > How would I do the same for ActiveRecord? > > > > > > Eric > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
