Also this suggests this is possible in earlier versions. I'm not sure how to force NUnit to run in Medium Trust though. Maybe we could create a plugin for this?
TODO: Investigate the plugin option http://blogs.msdn.com/shawnfa/archive/2004/11/02/251239.aspx On 6 Paź, 13:14, Jonathon Rossi <[email protected]> wrote: > This does seem possible in at least .NET > 4.0:http://blogs.rev-net.com/ddewinter/2009/05/22/how-to-host-a-partial-t...http://blogs.msdn.com/clrteam/archive/2009/06/10/new-security-model-m... > > 2009/10/6 Krzysztof Koźmic (2) <[email protected]> > > > > > > > I'm not sure. I did a research on this some time ago, and found no > > good solution. > > > On 6 Paź, 11:33, John Simons <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Is there any test we can write to ensure Medium trust works and we > > > don't break it by mistake? > > > > On Oct 6, 8:28 pm, Krzysztof Koźmic (2) <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Cool John, > > > > > Keep us posted if you find the cause of this misbehavior. > > > > > Krzysztof > > > > > On 6 Paź, 11:13, John Polling <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > I think for me the issue lies with NHibernate now. I'll post > > > > > something on the NHib group. > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > John > > > > > > On Oct 5, 8:22 pm, Krzysztof Koźmic <[email protected]> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > John, > > > > > > > Were you able to detect which assembly is the cause of the > > exception? > > > > > > > Krzysztof > > > > > > > John Polling wrote: > > > > > > > Hi Roelof, > > > > > > > > Unfortunately I've already done all that :-(. > > > > > > > > I'm starting to think I need to move to a new hosting company who > > > > > > > don't switch to medium trust suddenly. > > > > > > > > John > > > > > > > > On Oct 5, 6:21 am, Roelof Blom <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > >> Make sure you have marked all *referenced* assemblies with the > > > > > > >> AllowPartiallyTrustedCallersAttribute assembly level attribute, > > don't forget > > > > > > >> your assembly with AR models. > > > > > > > >> Build Castle with the following command: 'build.cmd > > > > > > >> -D:assembly.allow-partially-trusted-callers=true'. > > > > > > > >> -- Roelof. > > > > > > > >> 2009/10/5 John Polling <[email protected]> > > > > > > > >>> I appear to still be having problems with Medium Trust. > > > > > > >>> I've set the ActiveRecord settings as described here > > > > > > >>>http://nhforge.org/wikis/howtonh/run-in-medium-trust.aspx > > > > > > > >>> Has anyone got any further than this? > > > > > > > >>> Here is the error I'm getting: > > > > > > > >>> Security Exception > > > > > > >>> Description: The application attempted to perform an operation > > not > > > > > > >>> allowed by the security policy. To grant this application the > > > > > > >>> required permission please contact your system administrator or > > change > > > > > > >>> the application's trust level in the configuration file. > > > > > > > >>> Exception Details: System.Security.SecurityException: That > > assembly > > > > > > >>> does not allow partially trusted callers. > > > > > > > >>> Source Error: > > > > > > > >>> An unhandled exception was generated during the execution of > > the > > > > > > >>> current web request. Information regarding the origin and > > location of > > > > > > >>> the exception can be identified using the exception stack trace > > below. > > > > > > > >>> Stack Trace: > > > > > > > >>> [SecurityException: That assembly does not allow partially > > trusted > > > > > > >>> callers.] > > > System.Security.CodeAccessSecurityEngine.ThrowSecurityException > > > > > > >>> (Assembly asm, PermissionSet granted, PermissionSet refused, > > > > > > >>> RuntimeMethodHandle rmh, SecurityAction action, Object demand, > > > > > > >>> IPermission permThatFailed) +150 > > > > > > >>> System.RuntimeTypeHandle.CreateInstance(RuntimeType type, > > Boolean > > > > > > >>> publicOnly, Boolean noCheck, Boolean& canBeCached, > > > > > > >>> RuntimeMethodHandle& ctor, Boolean& bNeedSecurityCheck) +0 > > > > > > >>> System.RuntimeType.CreateInstanceSlow(Boolean publicOnly, > > Boolean > > > > > > >>> fillCache) +86 > > > > > > >>> System.RuntimeType.CreateInstanceImpl(Boolean publicOnly, > > Boolean > > > > > > >>> skipVisibilityChecks, Boolean fillCache) +230 > > > > > > >>> System.Activator.CreateInstance(Type type, Boolean nonPublic) > > +67 > > > NHibernate.Bytecode.ActivatorObjectsFactory.CreateInstance(Type > > > > > > >>> type) +8 > > > > > > >>> NHibernate.Driver.ReflectionBasedDriver.CreateConnection() > > +28 > > > NHibernate.Connection.DriverConnectionProvider.GetConnection() +56 > > > NHibernate.Tool.hbm2ddl.SuppliedConnectionProviderConnectionHelper.Prepare > > > > > > >>> () +15 > > > NHibernate.Tool.hbm2ddl.SchemaMetadataUpdater.GetReservedWords > > > > > > >>> (Dialect dialect, IConnectionHelper connectionHelper) +65 > > > > > > >>> NHibernate.Tool.hbm2ddl.SchemaMetadataUpdater.Update > > > > > > >>> (ISessionFactory sessionFactory) +80 > > > > > > >>> NHibernate.Impl.SessionFactoryImpl..ctor(Configuration cfg, > > > > > > >>> IMapping mapping, Settings settings, EventListeners listeners) > > +599 > > > > > > >>> NHibernate.Cfg.Configuration.BuildSessionFactory() +87 > > > Castle.ActiveRecord.Framework.SessionFactoryHolder.GetSessionFactory > > > > > > >>> (Type type) +465 > > > Castle.ActiveRecord.Framework.SessionFactoryHolder.CreateSession > > > > > > >>> (Type type) +126 > > > > > > >>> Castle.ActiveRecord.ActiveRecordBase.FindAll(Type targetType, > > Order > > > > > > >>> [] orders, ICriterion[] criteria) +117 > > > > > > >>> Castle.ActiveRecord.ActiveRecordBase`1.FindAll(Order order, > > > > > > >>> ICriterion[] criteria) +129 > > > > > > >>> Syncmaster.Models.NewsItem.FindTop(Int32 i) +112 > > > > > > >>> Syncmaster.Controllers.HomeController.Index() +55 > > > > > > > >>> On Oct 2, 2:19 pm, John Polling <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > >>>> I did a quick a dirty check by removing the offending code and > > all is > > > > > > >>>> pretty much working, except I need to run through and set all > > the > > > > > > >>>> entity models to virtual :-) I'd forgotten how different the > > RC was > > > > > > >>>> to the trunk! > > > > > > > >>>> Thanks > > > > > > > >>>> John > > > > > > > >>>> On Oct 2, 1:47 pm, Krzysztof Koźmic < > > [email protected]> > > > > > > >>>> wrote: > > > > > > > >>>>> From the quick look I had: > > > > > > >>>>> The class initializes FileSystemWatcher, which accorting > > tohttp:// > > > msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.io.filesystemwatcher.aspx > > > > > > > >>>>> requires fulltrust. > > > > > > >>>>> I'm not familiar with the class, but I think we should do > > similar > > > > > > >>>>> things I do in DynamicProxy - verify that we have the > > required > > > > > > >>>>> permission, and disable this functionality if we don't. Is > > this > > > > > > >>>>> feasible? > > > > > > > >>>>> 2009/10/2 John <[email protected]>: > > > > > > > >>>>>> Hi, > > > > > > > >>>>>> My hosting company has usefully switched their servers > > tomedium > > > > > > >>>>>> trust. This has broken a site I've had running for a couple > > of years > > > > > > >>>>>> now. > > > > > > > >>>>>> Here is what's happened so far. > > > > > > >>>>>> 1. Upgrade to trunk and compiled with themediumtrustflag. > > > > > > >>>>>> 2. Krzysztof Koźmic fixed an issue with Dynamic Proxy > > > > > > >>>>>> 3. Upgraded the trunk to run off Boo 2.0.9.2. > > > > > > > >>>>>> However I'm still getting the following error, any > > suggestions would > > > > > > >>>>>> be greatly appreciated. > > > > > > > >>>>>> Security Exception > > > > > > >>>>>> Description: The application attempted to perform an > > operation not > > > > > > >>>>>> allowed by the security policy. To grant this application > > the > > > > > > >>>>>> required permission please contact your system administrator > > or > > > > > > > >>> change > > > > > > > >>>>>> the application'strustlevel in the configuration file. > > > > > > > >>>>>> Exception Details: System.Security.SecurityException: > > Request failed. > > > > > > > >>>>>> Source Error: > > > > > > > >>>>>> An unhandled exception was generated during the execution of > > the > > > > > > >>>>>> current web request. Information regarding the origin and > > location of > > > > > > >>>>>> the exception can be identified using the exception stack > > trace > > > > > > > >>> below. > > > > > > > >>>>>> Stack Trace: > > > > > > > >>>>>> [SecurityException: Request failed.] > > > Castle.MonoRail.Framework.FileAssemblyViewSourceLoader.GetViewFolderWatcher > > > > > > > >>>>>> (String path) +0 > > > Castle.MonoRail.Framework.FileAssemblyViewSourceLoader.InitViewFolderWatch > > > > > > > >>>>>> () +145 > > > Castle.MonoRail.Framework.FileAssemblyViewSourceLoader.add_ViewChanged > > > > > > > >>>>>> (FileSystemEventHandler value) +126 > > > > > > >>>>>> Castle.MonoRail.Views.Brail.BooViewEngine.Initialize() > > +474 > > > Castle.MonoRail.Framework.Services.DefaultViewEngineManager.Initialize > > > > > > > >>>>>> () +634 > > > Castle.MonoRail.Framework.Services.DefaultServiceInitializer.Initialize > > > > > > > >>>>>> (Object serviceInstance, IMonoRailServices container) +193 > > > Castle.MonoRail.Framework.Container.DefaultMonoRailContainer.CreateService > > > > > > > >>>>>> (Type type) +279 > > > > > > > >>>>>> Thanks > > > > > > > >>>>>> John > > -- > Jono --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
