I lost track of this discussion, but am glad to see it is still being investigated. Thanks to those working on it; haven't had time myself so I appreciate it. Sounds like I may be able to run on a trunk build again before too long.
Josh C. 480-270-4578 | josh [at] computeristsolutions [dot] com | http://computeristsolutions.com 2009/10/21 Krzysztof Koźmic <[email protected]> > > Donn, > > yes, please send it over - having a way to reproduce and work with it on > my machine would make it a lot easier to diagnose. > Thanks, > > kind regards, > > Krzysztof > > Donn Felker wrote: > > Krzysztof, > > > > I just downloaded the latest tonight and built the code with this > > command: > > > > build.cmd -D:assembly.allow-partially-trusted-callers=true > > > > This outputs the version to be: 2.0.1000.0 > > > > Upon firing up the app I receive the following security exception: > > > > ---------------------------------------START > > EXCEPTION--------------------------------------------------- > > Security Exception > > Description: The application attempted to perform an operation not > > allowed by the security policy. To grant this application the > > required permission please contact your system administrator or change > > the application's trust level in the configuration file. > > > > Exception Details: System.Security.SecurityException: Request for the > > permission of type 'System.Configuration.ConfigurationPermission, > > System.Configuration, Version=2.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, > > PublicKeyToken=b03f5f7f11d50a3a' failed. > > > > Source Error: > > > > An unhandled exception was generated during the execution of the > > current web request. Information regarding the origin and location of > > the exception can be identified using the exception stack trace below. > > > > Stack Trace: > > > > [SecurityException: Request for the permission of type > > 'System.Configuration.ConfigurationPermission, System.Configuration, > > Version=2.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b03f5f7f11d50a3a' > > failed.] > > System.Security.CodeAccessSecurityEngine.Check(Object demand, > > StackCrawlMark& stackMark, Boolean isPermSet) +0 > > System.Security.CodeAccessPermission.Demand() +58 > > System.Configuration.BaseConfigurationRecord.CheckPermissionAllowed > > (String configKey, Boolean requirePermission, Boolean > > isTrustedWithoutAptca) +99 > > > > > > Version Information: Microsoft .NET Framework Version:2.0.50727.4918; > > ASP.NET Version:2.0.50727.4918 > > > > ---------------------------------------END > > EXCEPTION--------------------------------------------------- > > > > I turned on CLR exceptions in VS and an exception was thrown here (see > > link for VS Screenshot): http://www.twitpic.com/mfkyz/full > > > > It looks like the recent change did not work in this instance. > > > > I have a demo project if you'd like to see it. Let me know and I can > > zip it up and send it over. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Donn > > > > On Oct 1, 12:51 pm, Krzysztof Koźmic <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > >> To anyone interested - this issue is (hopefully) fixed in the trunk. > >> Get it, test it - tell us if you find cases where it does not work. > >> > >> On 22 Wrz, 20:39, Krzysztof Koźmic <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> > >>> Yes, basically that's right. > >>> > >>> Donn Felker wrote: > >>> > >>>> Let me make sure I have this down correctly. > >>>> > >>>> I have two options right now. > >>>> > >>>> 1. Change the DP code to include the code snippet(s) above. > >>>> 2. Have my entities implement an empty unsigned interface. > >>>> > >>>> Correct? > >>>> > >>>> Thanks! > >>>> > >>>> Donn > >>>> > >>>> On Sep 12, 12:52 am, Krzysztof Koźmic <[email protected]> > >>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Yes in the DP, > >>>>> The only workaround that would make it work right now, is if your > >>>>> entity implemented an interface (even empty) that comes from an > >>>>> unsigned assembly > >>>>> > >>>>> 2009/9/11 Donn Felker <[email protected]>: > >>>>> > >>>>>> Krzysztof, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Thank you for looking into it. I opened a ticket. Where should this > >>>>>> code change be, in the DP code? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Thanks > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Donn > >>>>>> > > > > > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
