Alas! 'Tis true! I have inadvertently violated strong naming in my pursuit of code pureness! The horror!
In other words, can you point me a little further along into how this can be achieved? On Oct 29, 5:32 pm, Ayende Rahien <[email protected]> wrote: > You can add a facility that will only load stuff from dlls signed by a > particular key > > On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 8:14 AM, Uri Goldstein <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > I have a product where all dlls are signed and have strong names. The > > goal is to avoid having someone drop a single dll into the product's > > bin folder and disrupt stability. > > > If I have Windsor dynamically load dlls at run-time in my product, > > does it enforce the 'strong naming' feature I'm aiming for? > > > Thanks, > > urig --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
