hehe,

ok, let me know if you get a failing test for that and I'll be happy to 
fix it for you :)

Jan Limpens wrote:
> Bullsh*! This case is not failing, my assertion is incorrect.
> Seems to be something more local to my mess here then ;)
>
> 2009/12/2 Jan Limpens <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>>
>
>     here we go! that's mbunit, but you have this adapted to whatever
>     framework you use in 1 min
>
>     using Castle.MicroKernel.Registration;
>     using System.Diagnostics;
>     using Castle.Windsor;
>     using MbUnit.Framework;
>
>     namespace ProjectBase.Utils.Tests
>     {
>         public class TestContainerOrder
>         {
>             [Test]
>             public void
>     
> Services_should_keep_the_order_they_were_registered_when_retrieved_as_an_array()
>             {
>                 var container = new WindsorContainer();
>                 container.Register(
>                    
>     
> Component.For<IService>().ImplementedBy<Service1>().Named(typeof(Service1).Name),
>                    
>     
> Component.For<IService>().ImplementedBy<Service2>().Named(typeof(Service2).Name),
>                    
>     
> Component.For<IService>().ImplementedBy<Service3>().Named(typeof(Service3).Name),
>                    
>     
> Component.For<IConsume>().ImplementedBy<Consumer>().ServiceOverrides(ServiceOverride
>                                             .ForKey("Services")
>                                             .Eq(new[]
>                                                       {
>                                                           typeof
>     (Service3).Name,
>                                                         typeof
>     (Service1).Name,
>                                                         typeof
>     (Service2).Name
>                                                       }))
>                     );
>                 var consumer = container.Resolve<IConsume>();
>                 consumer.DoIt();
>                 AssertEx.That(() => consumer.Services[1].GetType() ==
>     typeof(Service3));
>                 AssertEx.That(() => consumer.Services[2].GetType() ==
>     typeof(Service1));
>                 AssertEx.That(() => consumer.Services[3].GetType() ==
>     typeof(Service2));
>             }
>         }
>
>         public interface IService { }
>         public class Service1 : IService { }
>         public class Service2 : IService { }
>         public class Service3 : IService { }
>         public class Consumer : IConsume
>         {
>             public IService[] Services { get; set; }
>             public void DoIt()
>             {
>                 foreach (var service in Services)
>                 {
>                     Debug.Write(service.GetType().Name);
>                 }
>             }
>         }
>
>         public interface IConsume
>         {
>             IService[] Services { get; set; }
>             void DoIt();
>         }
>     }
>
>     2009/12/1 Krzysztof Koźmic (2) <[email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>>
>
>         Jan,
>
>         could you provide a complete, failing test case, so that we're
>         both on
>         the same page?
>
>         Krzysztof
>
>         On 1 Gru, 08:46, Krzysztof Koźmic (2) <[email protected]
>         <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>         > I see no reason why that works that way.
>         >
>         > I'll have a look into it, once I get home.
>         >
>         > On 30 Lis, 17:45, Jan Limpens <[email protected]
>         <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>         >
>         > > I register some components like this:
>         >
>         > >                 Component.For<IRoutesSetup>()
>         > >                     .ImplementedBy<RoutesSetup>()
>         > >                     .LifeStyle.Transient
>         > >                     .ServiceOverrides(ServiceOverride
>         > >                                        
>         .ForKey("RoutingProviders")
>         > >                                         .Eq(new[]
>         > >                                                   {
>         > >                                                       typeof
>         > > (CmsPagesRoutesProvider).Name,
>         > >                                                     typeof
>         > > (DomainRoutesProvider).Name,
>         > >                                                     typeof
>         > > (XmlRoutesProvider).Name
>         > >                                                   }))
>         >
>         > > but upon resolving IRoutesSetup its RoutingProviders are
>         in a different
>         > > order. In xml I pass a list of service references
>         (list/items style) and
>         > > this does not seem to happen. Any way to do this fluently
>         as well?
>         >
>         > > --
>         > > Jan
>         >
>         >
>
>         --
>
>         You received this message because you are subscribed to the
>         Google Groups "Castle Project Users" group.
>         To post to this group, send email to
>         [email protected]
>         <mailto:[email protected]>.
>         To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>         [email protected]
>         <mailto:castle-project-users%[email protected]>.
>         For more options, visit this group at
>         http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.
>
>
>
>
>
>     -- 
>     Jan
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Jan
>
> --
>
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> Groups "Castle Project Users" group.
> To post to this group, send email to 
> [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Castle Project Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.


Reply via email to