Hi, I've created a new issue in donjon and attached two source files. Looking forward to see if they're of use to you. Here's a link to the issue: http://support.castleproject.org/projects/FACILITIES/issues/view/FACILITIES-ISSUE-134
Thanks urig PS - How come the WCF Integration Facility is not included in the Components list on the " New issue for project Facilities " page? On Jan 13, 11:03 pm, Craig Neuwirt <[email protected]> wrote: > Go to Facilities / Issue Tracker (left) and add an issue. Just put as much > information as you can. If you don't have a patch, just provide your > extension > > 2010/1/13 Uri Goldstein <[email protected]> > > > Ok, so donjon is castle's issue tracking software? > > How can I upload a patch then? Should I open an issue? > > And must it be a patch to the actual facility code? I'm not really > > familiar with where my code fits in. Wouldn't it be better if I just > > supplied the one behavior extension class that I have? > > > Thanks, > > urig > > > BTW - Not to be rude, but is there really a case for yet another web > > based issue tracking system out there? :) > > > On Jan 12, 9:21 pm, Craig Neuwirt <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Yeah, go ahead and create a patch in donjon for this and we'll take a > > look > > > at how to fit it in best > > > > 2010/1/12 Uri Goldstein <[email protected]> > > > > > Hi Krzysztof, > > > > > Thank you for your kind fuslogvw greeting, though I have no idea what > > > > assembly binding has to do with it ;) > > > > > We did manage to discover how to set the maxClockSkew property through > > > > an endpoint behavior. I take little credit - it was one of the > > > > programmers in my team who cracked it. There steps are: > > > > 1. Cast the binding to a custom binding. > > > > 2. Clone the Elements collection of the custom binding to the side. > > > > 3. Clear the Elements collection and then iterate over the clone, > > > > modifying elements and readding them to the Elements property. > > > > 4. The MaxClockSkew setting must be modified in SecurityBindingElement > > > > elements... > > > > 5. And it must be set *inside* the > > > > SecureConversationSecurityTokenParameters property of elements - and > > > > there's a different syntax for each of the 3 variations(!) > > > > (TransportSecurityBindingElement/SymmetricSecurityBindingElement/ > > > > AsymmetricSecurityBindingElement) > > > > > All in all, quite nasty but does the trick. If you'd like, I'd be > > > > happy to share the code with you and everyone. Any preferred way for > > > > me to do that? > > > > > I'll rephrase my original question - How can I learn how to extend the > > > > Wcf Integration Facility's DefaultServiceHostFactory? I have quite a > > > > few "global" (cross-service) tasks that probably belong there so how > > > > do I extend it? > > > > Should I inherit from it? Is there a plugin API for it? > > > > > fuslogvw and many thanks, > > > > urig > > > > > On Jan 7, 10:25 pm, Krzysztof Koźmic <[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > I tried dealing with this problem once, and I gave up and created a > > > > > custom binding where I set that. > > > > > There was no hook to swap the value before WCF did its magic, and > > when I > > > > > changed the value > > > > > after the host was created it would still remain at the default of 5 > > > > > minutes. > > > > > I'll look at it over the weekend if I find a spare moment, but I make > > no > > > > > promisses. > > > > > If you were able to investigate that and find a way to reliably > > change > > > > > the value, it would help a lot. > > > > > I'd be (only) left with integrating that with the facility. > > > > > > fuslogvw! > > > > > (means good luck in Polish) > > > > > > Krzysztof > > > > > > On 2010-01-07 21:19, Uri Goldstein wrote: > > > > > > > Hi Krzysztof, > > > > > > > I configure my endpoints from the web.config file. I'm hoping for a > > > > > > solution where I write a "plugin" (originally I planned for an > > > > > > endpoint behavior) that will do the work and hook up to the > > endpoint > > > > > > through the config file. > > > > > > > Uri > > > > > > > On Jan 6, 5:00 pm, Krzysztof Ko mic (2)<[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > >> Uri, > > > > > > >> How do you configure your endpoints? From .config or > > programatically? > > > > > > >> Krzysztof > > > > > > >> On 6 Sty, 15:55, Uri Goldstein<[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > >>> Hi, > > > > > > >>> We're trying to find a convenient way to set the maxClockSkew > > > > property > > > > > >>> on WSHttpBinding (http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ > > > system.servicemodel.channels.localservicesecuritysettings.maxclockskew.aspx). > > > > > >>> The traditional way of turning the WSHttpBinding into a > > CustomBinding > > > > > >>> and then setting it there is not desirable for us as the > > > > configuration > > > > > >>> is quite big. > > > > > > >>> We've tried writing an Endpoint Behavior to do the work > > > > > >>> programmatically through AddBindingParameters() but that doesn't > > seem > > > > > >>> to work. > > > > > > >>> My question is - Is there a good entry point in the WCF > > Integration > > > > > >>> Facility for a small piece of code that will change the > > maxClockSkew > > > > > >>> property programmatically? I'm hoping for some point of > > extensibility > > > > > >>> that can alter the binding description before it is > > instantiated(?) > > > > > > >>> Many Thanks, > > > > > >>> Uri Goldstein. > > > > > -- > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > Groups > > > > "Castle Project Users" group. > > > > To post to this group, send email to > > [email protected] > > > > . > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > > [email protected]<castle-project-users%[email protected]> > > <castle-project-users%[email protected]<castle-project-users%[email protected]> > > > > > . > > > > For more options, visit this group at > > > >http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en. > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Castle Project Users" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > > . > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]<castle-project-users%[email protected]> > > . > > For more options, visit this group at > >http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.
