Jan, I know you know, but I want to be explicit - this is a blogpost proof of concept toy code of throwaway quality. Other than that - let me know how it works for you and if you'd change/ extend it somehow.
Krzysztof On 22 Lut, 15:04, Jan Limpens <[email protected]> wrote: > the line > > componentName = dependency.DependencyKey; > > sounds exactly what i need. haven't tried it so far, though > > thanks a lot! > > 2010/2/22 Krzysztof Koźmic (2) <[email protected]> > > > > > do you mean something like this? > > >http://kozmic.pl/archive/2009/04/09/convention-based-dependency-injec... > > > On 22 Lut, 14:01, Jan Limpens <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I have this, and think it is not very elegant > > > > , Component.For<AutomapperBootstrapper>() > > > .ServiceOverrides(new > > > { > > > urlResolverForNamedEntities = "urlResolverForNamedEntities", > > > priceResolver = "priceResolver" > > > }) > > > > Is there a ready made facility around this? > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Castle Project Users" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > > . > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]<castle-project-users%[email protected]> > > . > > For more options, visit this group at > >http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en. > > -- > Jan -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.
