Henrik,
what's the status of your release?
Krzysztof
On 3/1/2010 12:05 PM, Henrik Feldt wrote:
Hi,
Actually, it seems I never pushed them :p. They are there now.
Cheers
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of MoonStorm
Sent: den 1 mars 2010 11:03
To: Castle Project Users
Subject: Re: Transaction Management - The chain of resources not rolled back
if one fails
You sure you pushed them? On GIT, the only thing I could find under
Transactions are the interfaces. Maybe I'm looking at the wrong
place...
On Mar 1, 2:56 am, "Henrik Feldt"<[email protected]> wrote:
Hello,
I've pushed the changes, but not everything is in there yet (hence the
tag,
1.5, not 2.0.)
Going to do the rest tomorrow... To be added:
- tests
- bugfix for this message
If you could code me a failing test-case till tomorrow I'd be happy and
it's
be done quicker.
Regards,
Henrik
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of MoonStorm
Sent: den 1 mars 2010 01:36
To: Castle Project Users
Subject: Re: Transaction Management - The chain of resources not rolled
back
if one fails
I don't remember encountering problems with any of them. I compiled
Castle.Services.Transaction,
Castle.Facilities.AutomaticTransactionManagement and
Castle.Facilities.ActiveRecordIntegration (I think on this last one I
encountered an insignificant change in a method definition) against
the latest version of core.
Btw, it would be nice, with this release, to update the various
integrations as well. Effectively they are the ones that bring real
value to cross-resource transactions, and being so small, it would be
a shame to leave them behind. Well, I'm talking from the perspective
of 1.x version of transactions. Can't say anything about the 2.x
version though as I didn't have a chance to see it.
On Mar 1, 12:20 am, "Henrik Feldt"<[email protected]> wrote:
Hi,
Well, I'm technically not asleep yet and I haven't discussed time-zones.
;)
I'm currently updatinghttp://github.com/hafwiththe latest code, but
there's a bit of trickery with the submodules...
Tell me; are all the dependencies you are using coherent with each
other?
I'm going to depend on the latest versions of all of them...
Regards,
Henrik
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of MoonStorm
Sent: den 1 mars 2010 00:49
To: Castle Project Users
Subject: Re: Transaction Management - The chain of resources not rolled
back
if one fails
No release today... :(
Btw, could you tell me where the latest code is located? I had a look
at the SVN repository and the build server output and it's all old.
Could you point me to the right location please?
On Feb 27, 7:40 pm, "Henrik Feldt"<[email protected]> wrote:
Roger that, I've had the same problem.
Fix coming up tomorrow together with release.
Cheers,
Henrik
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of MoonStorm
Sent: den 27 februari 2010 19:06
To: Castle Project Users
Subject: Transaction Management - The chain of resources not rolled
back
if
one fails
Here is a simple scenario using the existing implementation of
Castle.Services.Transaction
Transaction manager receives a green light for resource chain commit
and calls every resource enlisted.
Resource1 tries to commit but fails with an exception.
AbstractTransaction cathes the exception and stores it for later use;
the transaction is also given an invalid state.
Resource2 is called now (surprisingly for commit!).
At the end of the chain, the aforementioned exception is wrapped and
re-thrown.
With this in mind, having the AR facility in place and my custom
resource registered as well, a DB commit may fail but my component
will commit, leaving the system in an unstable state.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups
"Castle Project Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to
[email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group
athttp://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups
"Castle Project Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to
[email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group
athttp://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Castle Project Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to
[email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group
athttp://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle
Project Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.
