Thanks for the help, and somewhat rude comments. I was unaware that the monorail param binding was only by name, I was using the formhelpers, but just used html to code the form.
Thanks again, Jake On Apr 8, 10:12 pm, Ken Egozi <[email protected]> wrote: > Jake - notice the difference between id and name. > what gets posted from the Form to the server are values *by name*. > on the other hand, the element identifier in the DOM is id, which must be > singular on a web page. > > so > have your three forms, each with the same names for the fields, but with > different ids. > That is how you do web development. > > now as far as the endpoint on the server, my personal preference is that if > you have different forms, they probably serve a slightly different purpose, > and I'd have three controller actions (i'd even separate them by name) to > deal with them. > > On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 12:28 AM, John Simons > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > Hi Jake, > > > I think you answered your own question, don't use the same action have > > an action per tab. > > Eg. > > public void ActionForTabs([DataBind("Tab1Data", Validate = > > true)]Tab1Data data){} > > > public void ActionForTabs([DataBind("Tab2Data", Validate = > > true)]Tab2Data data){} > > > public void ActionForTabs([DataBind("Tab3Data", Validate = > > true)]Tab3Data data){} > > > Does this help? > > > Cheers > > John > > > On Apr 9, 6:41 am, jake <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I'm having an issue with my webpage using javascript and monorail > > > param binding. I have a page the uses jquery UI to display tabs, each > > > tab has a form that submits to the same action. The issue is that by > > > using the same action I am forced to create multiple elements with the > > > same ID. This is not only a bad practice, it breaks the javascript > > > used for form validation. Any Ideas? I've looked into using an > > > identifier, such as element1, element2, and then in my action binding > > > element by something like this: > > > > string element = Form["{regex match element%d}"] > > > > I'm looking for a solution that would be more elegant. > > > > Thanks, > > > Jake > > > > -- > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Castle Project Users" group. > > > To post to this group, send email to > > [email protected]. > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]<castle-project-users%[email protected]> > > . > > > For more options, visit this group athttp:// > > groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en. > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Castle Project Users" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > > . > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]<castle-project-users%[email protected]> > > . > > For more options, visit this group at > >http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en. > > -- > Ken > Egozi.http://www.kenegozi.com/bloghttp://www.delver.comhttp://www.musicglue.comhttp://www.castleproject.orghttp://www.idcc.co.il- > הכנס הקהילתי הראשון למפתחי דוטנט - בואו בהמוניכם -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.
