Thiago,
This is quite interesting indeed and I admire your determination on this
one.
Actually I would really want to turn DynamicProxy into more extensible
type generation framework to allow for few scenarios we want to support
internally in Castle.
1. async calls on sync contract in Silverlight version of WCF
Facility (hey Frederic:) ). We do it differently in full .NET
version of the facility (by extending the type system), but since
the API is not there in Silverlight, our only option would be to
generate a totally new type that has no inheritance relation to
the "blueprint" type and only uses it to obtain some information
about its own shape. So this is certainly not usual DynamicProxy
job :)
2. in v2.5 we want to merge DictionaryAdapter into Castle.Core.dll,
and for future version since both DP and DA use runtime type
generation I'd like to bring them closer together and make as much
of core, low level stuff between them as makes sense
Current version (v2.2, but there aren't many changes in upcomming v2.5
in this area) is a point in the middle between old monolithic
architecture and something more modular.
ITypeContributors were my attempt at introducing this modularity at
member level. I'm still not quite happy about how it played out (the
mixins hack) but it's step in the right direction I think.
All in all, if you'd like to exchange some ideas about it I'd be happy
to. Let's use Wiki for this not to pollute the discussion group. I guess
Craig and Frederic (and whoever else is interested) should join the
discussion as well.
http://stw.castleproject.org/Tools.DynamicProxy-Roadmap.ashx?Discuss=1&NoRedirect=1&NS=Tools
On 2010-05-09 01:59, Thiago de Arruda wrote:
http://www.codeproject.com/KB/dotnet/extensibledynproxy.aspx
This is the better I could do on extending the proxies. Tell me your
opinions.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle
Project Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.
