If you look under the MonoRail namespace, you'll see the complete documentation is now converted to our new Wiki page ! Pfff... How's that for 8 hours of FUN ;) haha...
Do hop in, take a look and mark where documentation is outdated or could need more work... On 6 mei, 10:40, Krzysztof Koźmic (2) <[email protected]> wrote: > right. You have global "Manage Pages and Categories" permission > > On 6 Maj, 10:23, rheenen <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Or... I could just add the category at the same time as creating the > > new page... oops... > > > On 6 mei, 10:20, rheenen <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Thanks... Then, it seems I am missing the permissions to add > > > categories. > > > > On this page:http://stw.castleproject.org/MonoRail.Category.aspx > > > I can only 'view' categories... > > > > On 6 mei, 10:03, Krzysztof Koźmic (2) <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Martijn > > > > > I gave you explicit permission to edit pages, categories and to upload > > > > files. > > > > > We have yet to configure permissions correctly. If you find you're > > > > missing some > > > > permissions or I let you do something I shouldn't have let me know :) > > > > > On 6 Maj, 09:50, rheenen <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > I'm trying to add the MonoRail documentation as I promised earlier. It > > > > > seems I am not allowed to add or manage categories under this > > > > > namespace? Or am I not using the ScrewWiki (who chose that name????) > > > > > the right way... > > > > > > On 5 mei, 22:50, Krzysztof Koźmic <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Or we could do that :) > > > > > > > On 2010-05-05 22:49, Henry Conceição wrote: > > > > > > > > Why not add a Tools (for DynProxy and Nvelocity), Facilities and a > > > > > > > Components namespace? > > > > > > > > On 5 maio, 02:57, Krzysztof Koźmic<[email protected]> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> I also added Active Record namespace to the project, and link to > > > > > > >> MonoRail namespace on the main site:http://stw.castleproject.org/ > > > > > > > >> For smaller projects (Dynamic Proxy, facilities that live in > > > > > > >> their own > > > > > > >> projects, components like validation etc) I suggest we put docs > > > > > > >> in the > > > > > > >> root namespace. > > > > > > > >> cheers, > > > > > > >> Krzysztof > > > > > > > >> On 2010-04-29 14:13, Symon Rottem wrote: > > > > > > > >>> Hi Guys, > > > > > > > >>> Sorry I missed the party - was out quaffing wine in the French > > > > > > >>> countryside! > > > > > > > >>> Anyhoo, as Martijn has already passed on: go ahead and take > > > > > > >>> whatever > > > > > > >>> you want from those docs. > > > > > > > >>> Cheers, > > > > > > > >>> Symon. > > > > > > > >>> Symon Rottem > > > > > > >>>http://blog.symbiotic-development.com > > > > > > > >>> On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 1:23 PM, Martijn van Rheenen > > > > > > >>> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > > > > >>> I got an answer from Symon, I'll quote him: > > > > > > > >>> "Hi Martijn, > > > > > > > >>> I've got no problem with you using it - just keep in mind > > > > > > >>> that the > > > > > > >>> the content is all for v1RC3, not the current version. > > > > > > > >>> I did it as an experiment but there was a lot of discussion > > > > > > >>> surrounding it and concerns were raised about using > > > > > > >>> DocBook format > > > > > > >>> so I abandoned it eventually. > > > > > > > >>> Personally I like the structure, but current content should > > > > > > >>> probably be used. > > > > > > > >>> Cheers, > > > > > > > >>> Symon." > > > > > > > >>> So, all systems are go ;) > > > > > > > >>> 2010/4/27 Martijn van Rheenen<[email protected] > > > > > > >>> <mailto:[email protected]>> > > > > > > > >>> Thanks, I just found it thanks to some googling too ;) > > > > > > >>> Already > > > > > > >>> sent him a message. > > > > > > > >>> 2010/4/27 James Curran<[email protected] > > > > > > >>> <mailto:[email protected]>> > > > > > > > >>> When he last left a message on this mail list > > > > > > >>> (actually > > > > > > >>> the devel > > > > > > >>> version), he was using the email address of > > > > > > >>> {first-initial}.{lastna...@{email service provided > > > > > > >>> by the > > > > > > >>> company > > > > > > >>> hosting this mail list} > > > > > > > >>> Truth, > > > > > > >>> James > > > > > > > >>> 2010/4/27 Martijn van Rheenen<[email protected] > > > > > > >>> <mailto:[email protected]>>: > > > > > > >>> > I will use that namespace and categories > > > > > > >>> ofcourse. > > > > > > >>> > Just sent a message to Simon, who made a great > > > > > > >>> start for > > > > > > >>> the new > > > > > > >>> > documentation indeed(!), at > > > > > > >>> "[email protected] > > > > > > >>> <mailto:[email protected]>", but it > > > > > > >>> was > > > > > > >>> > returned to me. Couldn't find any other e-mail > > > > > > >>> address > > > > > > >>> of him, so I hope > > > > > > >>> > he's on this mailinglist. His blog has not been > > > > > > >>> updated > > > > > > >>> since late 2008, > > > > > > >>> > too... > > > > > > > >>> > 2010/4/27 Krzysztof > > > > > > >>> Koźmic<[email protected] > > > > > > >>> <mailto:[email protected]>> > > > > > > > >>> >> Cool, > > > > > > > >>> >> Make sure you add MonoRail specific content > > > > > > >>> under > > > > > > >>> Monorail namespace in > > > > > > >>> >> the wiki > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> http://stw.castleproject.org/MonoRail.Default.aspxandtake > > > > > > >>> >> advantage of categories. > > > > > > > >>> >> cheers, > > > > > > >>> >> Krzysztof > > > > > > > >>> >> On 2010-04-27 21:35, Martijn van Rheenen wrote: > > > > > > > >>> >> I agree and am willing to port it over > > > > > > >>> tomorrow. I'll > > > > > > >>> mail Symon and see > > > > > > >>> >> what he thinks. I'll make sure every page > > > > > > >>> states the > > > > > > >>> content has to be > > > > > > >>> >> validates against the latest version of > > > > > > >>> MonoRail... > > > > > > > >>> >> 2010/4/27 Krzysztof > > > > > > >>> Koźmic<[email protected] > > > > > > >>> <mailto:[email protected]>> > > > > > > > >>> >>> Certainly, if Symon does not have anything > > > > > > >>> against us > > > > > > >>> reusing his work, > > > > > > >>> >>> it's worth to reuse what's already out there. > > > > > > >>> >>> We just need to pay attention to the accuracy > > > > > > >>> of the > > > > > > >>> information > > > > > > >>> >>> provided, to make sure it's true for current > > > > > > >>> version/trunk. > > > > > > > >>> >>> Krzysztof > > > > > > > >>> >>> On 2010-04-27 21:26, James Curran wrote: > > > > > > > >>> >>>> Symon Rottem's documentation project > > > > > > >>> >>>> > > > > > > >>> (http://www.symbiotic-development.com/monorail/html/) > > > > > > >>> seems to have > > > > > > >>> >>>> stalled, but there's plenty of good > > > > > > >>> information > > > > > > >>> there, and what's > > > > > > >>> >>>> more, a good structure to be filled in. I'd > > > > > > >>> suggest > > > > > > >>> that we move it > > > > > > >>> >>>> into the wiki where more people can > > > > > > >>> contribute to it > > > > > > > >>> >>>> Truth, > > > > > > >>> >>>> James > > > > > > > >>> >>>> 2010/4/27 Krzysztof > > > > > > >>> Koźmic<[email protected] > > > > > > >>> <mailto:[email protected]>>: > > > > > > > >>> >>>>> Yes, I'm focusing on Windsor. MonoRail, > > > > > > >>> ActiveRecord > > > > > > >>> and other > > > > > > >>> >>>>> components > > > > > > >>> >>>>> need their share of love too :) > > > > > > > >>> >>>>> On 2010-04-27 21:05, Martijn van Rheenen > > > > > > >>> wrote: > > > > > > > >>> >>>>> Ooops... i stand corrected ;) I was > > > > > > >>> primarily > > > > > > >>> looking for MonoRail / > > > > > > >>> >>>>> ActiveRecord documentation I guess... So > > > > > > >>> some work > > > > > > >>> and help is needed > > > > > > >>> >>>>> there, > > > > > > >>> >>>>> porting the existing documentation. I am > > > > > > >>> volunteering already ;) > > > > > > > >>> >>>>> 2010/4/27 Martijn van > > > > > > >>> Rheenen<[email protected] > > > > > > >>> <mailto:[email protected]>> > > > > > > > >>> >>>>>> So I assume the migration has not started > > > > > > >>> yet, as > > > > > > >>> there is only the > > > > > > >>> >>>>>> Editor's Guide and the Main page? > > > > > > > >>> >>>>>> 2010/4/27 Krzysztof > > > > > > >>> Koźmic<[email protected] > > > > > > >>> <mailto:[email protected]>> > > > > > > > >>> >>>>>>> Some time ago Henry installed > > > > > > >>> ScrewTurnWiki under > > > > > > >>> >>>>>>>http://stw.castleproject.organdwestarted > > > > > > >>> migrating (and updating!) > > > > > > >>> >>>>>>> our > > > > > > >>> >>>>>>> documentation for Castle. > > > > > > >>> >>>>>>> When the migration is over the > > > > > > >>> http://using.castleproject.organd > > > > > > >>> >>>>>>> current > > ... > > meer lezen » -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.
