IIRC the integration was on the roadmap already :)
On 2010-05-28 03:19, [email protected] wrote:
Ohh.. I see.. I will study the sources.... I have no time at all at
the moment but
I've always wanted that Quartz works with castle...
Any objection why this couldn't be a good idea ?
On 25 mayo, 16:18, John Simons<[email protected]> wrote:
The only benefit you get from using the Castle Scheduler is the
integration with IoC (Windsor) out of the box.
But you can get this same integration with Quartz.Net,
seehttp://bugsquash.blogspot.com/2009/03/windsor-facility-for-quartznet....
It would be good to create an Integration facility for Quartz.net
(based on what Mauricio has already done) and deprecate the Castle
Scheduler one, any takers?
Cheers
John
On May 26, 2:36 am, "[email protected]"
<[email protected]> wrote:
Hello,
I see that the scheduler is released.. good!
I work with Quartz.net... my question is,
Why do not use (integrated or something) the Quart.net if it is a
"mature" technology?
Why to duplicate this effort?
Regards and congratulations because Castle is very active..
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle
Project Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group
athttp://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle
Project Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.
