no, i'm not familiar with the MR web server On Jul 14, 8:22 am, John Simons <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks for the feedback Jason. > BTW, are you also using the WebServer shipped in the > Castle.MonoRail.TestSupport > assembly? > > Cheers > John > > ________________________________ > From: Jason Meckley <[email protected]> > To: Castle Project Users <[email protected]> > Sent: Wed, 14 July, 2010 10:19:55 PM > Subject: Re: Monorail v2.1 roadmap > > true. it's more of preference then preformance. > > On Jul 14, 7:53 am, Ken Egozi <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > well it costs next to nothing, and is not JITted of not used, and the > > benefit of simpler distribution and maintenance outweigh the couple of bytes > > it takes in the .dll > > > On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 2:08 PM, Jason Meckley > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > the list seems very good. I'm especially looking forward to windsor > > > 2.5. > > > I could see merging binders, transform filters and the core framework > > > into a single assembly. I would keep test support in a separate > > > assembly though. the idea of deploying stub objects, designed for > > > testing, into production doesn't seem right. > > > > On Jul 14, 12:01 am, John Simons <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Dear Monorail users, > > > > > This upcoming release is mostly (see below) a bugfix release, therefore, > > > there > > > > shouldn't be any breaking changes unless is part of a bug fix but even > > > those > > > > will be documented as part of the release. > > > > So if you are using v2.0 or earlier and have one or more pesty bugs > > > annoying > > > > you, please submit it herehttp:// > > > support.castleproject.org/projects/MR/issuesbrowserASAP. > > > > > If you feel like stepping in and help us fix some of the opened issues, > > > have a > > > > look at this issues list - > > >http://support.castleproject.org/projects/MR/issuesbrowser#criteria=v... > > > > > and readhttp:// > > > stw.castleproject.org/How-to-submit-a-fix-to-any-Castle-Projec.... > > > > > But because it would be too boring to only have bug fixes in this > > > release, here > > > > is a list of new features (not all features are complete yet): > > > > > - Added support for inferred actions, If you have controller actions > > > > that > > > their > > > > sole purpose is to render a view, then you are going to love this. You > > > > no > > > longer > > > > have to declare empty actions, MR will look in your views folder and > > > display > > > > that view automatically. If view is not found a 404 is thrown. > > > > - Added new helper called ActionHelper that invokes the specified child > > > action > > > > and returns the result inline or as an HTML string, aka MS MVC > > > Html.RenderAction > > > > and Html.Action seehttp:// > > > haacked.com/archive/2009/11/18/aspnetmvc2-render-action.aspx > > > > - Action Filter attributes - Gauthier Segay is working on this one :) > > > > - Support for anti-forgery token in post backs - - Gauthier Segay is > > > also > > > > working on this one :) > > > > - ForHelper, this one is still a work in progress but the idea is to > > > replicate > > > > thishttp:// > > > bradwilson.typepad.com/blog/2009/10/aspnet-mvc-2-templates-par... > > > > > (I'll be committing the first cut very shortly, and this may end up > > > replacing > > > > the existing scaffolding) > > > > - Planning to add a few enhancements to CombineJSViewComponent based > > > onhttp://weblogs.asp.net/rashid/archive/2009/11/09/web-asset-enhancemen... > > > > > - Planning to ship Samples in zip package, these samples will be using > > > > NVelocity as the view engine (hope everyone is happy with this > > > > decision?) > > > > - VS2010 templates + resharper templates, this is not intellisense! > > > > - Windsor upgraded to v2.5 > > > > - Thinking of using Windsor container as the default IoC container in > > > > MR, > > > but I > > > > need Krzysztof's help with this one, and it may be a big task for this > > > release > > > > > Also, I'm planning to reduce the number of assemblies in MR. So the plan > > > is to > > > > merge Castle.MonoRail.TestSupport, Castle.MonoRail.TransformFilters and > > > > Castle.Components.Binder into Castle.Monorail.Framework. > > > > If you are using Castle.Components.Binder on its own please let us know! > > > > > Finally, if you have any other suggestions, ideas or want to help the > > > > development of any of these new features let us know here, we do need > > > your help! > > > > > Cheers > > > > John > > > > -- > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > > "Castle Project Users" group. > > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > > > . > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > >[email protected]<castle-project-users%[email protected]> > > > > . > > > For more options, visit this group at > > >http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en. > > > -- > > Ken > >Egozi.http://www.kenegozi.com/bloghttp://www.delver.comhttp://www.musicglue... > > הכנס הקהילתי הראשון למפתחי דוטנט - בואו בהמוניכם > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Castle Project Users" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group > athttp://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.
