Can we step back a little?
What are you trying to do? Container aside.
On 29/08/2010 9:41 PM, barroei wrote:
why doesnt it make sense?
i want to make the entire service generic.
add Interfaces dynamicaly and add the Implementation class that is
attached to it.
without touching the once that are already registered.
there must be an option to do it.
is there an option to tell the Implementation class to implement
another interface ?
and load the interface implementation as a dependency class?
On Aug 29, 2:19 pm, Krzysztof Koźmic<[email protected]>
wrote:
This doesn't make any sense.
sent from my HTC Desire
On 29/08/2010 9:16 PM, "barroei"<[email protected]> wrote:
i cant use different names.
its the same service.
i want it to have multiple interfaces.
meaning multiple servicecontracts on the same service.
i can easily do it if implement all interfaces by the same class.
but i want it to be generic and have an implementation class per each
interface
On Aug 29, 10:05 am, Ayende Rahien<[email protected]> wrote:
You need different names
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 9:49 AM, barroei<[email protected]> wrote:
hello.
i am tr...
[email protected]<castle-project-users%2bun[email protected]>
<castle-project-users%2bun[email protected]>
.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.-Hide quoted
text -
- Show quoted text -
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Castle Project Users" gro...
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle
Project Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.
