oh, ok, that is one i missed :-) tell me is there a built on WCFIntegration.Dll that support 2.5 version cause if i remove the MicroKernel Dll it says that :
The type 'Castle.MicroKernel.Facilities.AbstractFacility' is defined in an assembly that is not referenced. You must add a reference to assembly 'Castle.MicroKernel, Version=1.0.3.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=407dd0808d44fbdc'. On Aug 29, 4:17 pm, Krzysztof Koźmic <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes but it won't be dynamic. It has to implement interfaces it > exposes, and a type can't gain an interface dynamically. > > On 29/08/2010 11:08 PM, barroei wrote: > > > > > i can have the implementaion class also as a container class > > > On Aug 29, 4:00 pm, Krzysztof Koźmic<[email protected]> > > wrote: > >> I forgot to add you need version 2.5 to get that Mixin syntax. > > >> Yes you can have one implementation that forwards to other > >> implementation but I thought you mentioned you wanted this to be dynamic... > > >> On 29/08/2010 10:58 PM, barroei wrote: > > >>> i cant get the damn syntax for the MixIn, > >>> i had in mind another idea, to have a single Implenetation Class, that > >>> has dependencies to all > >>> other Implementation classes. > >>> that should be easier to implement wont you think? > >>> On Aug 29, 3:48 pm, Krzysztof Koźmic<[email protected]> > >>> wrote: > >>>> How else would you want to do it than via dynamic proxy? Again - > >>>> container aside. > >>>> On 29/08/2010 10:47 PM, barroei wrote: > >>>>> I didnt try the proxy option yet. > >>>>> but will it work with more then 2 interfaces? > >>>>> On Aug 29, 3:40 pm, Krzysztof Koźmic<[email protected]> > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>>> Well what I think might work, is registering all the pieces > >>>>>> separately > >>>>>> and then picking one of them as the host and mixing in all the > >>>>>> remaining > >>>>>> ones. > >>>>>> container.Register( > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Component.For<IFirst>().ImplementedBy<First>().Proxy.MixIns(m => > >>>>>> m.Service<ISecond>()), > >>>>>> Component.For<ISecond>().ImplementedBy<Second>()); > >>>>>> This is the idea, but I'm not sure how DynamicProxy will handle all the > >>>>>> WCF attributes. > >>>>>> On 29/08/2010 10:34 PM, barroei wrote: > >>>>>>> yep, > >>>>>>> you got exactly the idea :-) > >>>>>>> the thing is building it is abit complex since i cant get the howto > >>>>>>> build the damn thing. > >>>>>>> this is the first IOC that seems todo so, very close to what > >>>>>>> Spring .NET does. > >>>>>>> but still, there is something missing, and i cant get the damn thing > >>>>>>> to work. > >>>>>>> i have tried multiple overrides to try to use the current registration > >>>>>>> model, but it just doesnt add up. > >>>>>>> i can download the sources and try to fix it, but i think i am missing > >>>>>>> something > >>>>>>> and it can be done in the current registration model. > >>>>>>> i just cant figure out the how... > >>>>>>> On Aug 29, 3:04 pm, Krzysztof Koźmic<[email protected]> > >>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>> ah I think I vaguely begin to see what you're trying to do > >>>>>>>> so you want an umbrella object that would implement multiple > >>>>>>>> interfaces > >>>>>>>> and contain multiple other obects that each implement one of these > >>>>>>>> interfaces and then route calls to each interface to its respective > >>>>>>>> implementation object and on top of that expose everything as WCF > >>>>>>>> service? > >>>>>>>> On 29/08/2010 9:52 PM, barroei wrote: > >>>>>>>>> do u have google talk ? or msn? it will be much easier... > >>>>>>>>> the general idea is to make a dynamic multi endpoint WCF service > >>>>>>>>> over > >>>>>>>>> IIS > >>>>>>>>> meaning i want the service to be able to load Interface dynamicly > >>>>>>>>> as i > >>>>>>>>> am doing if i set a single Interface. > >>>>>>>>> but i would also like to make it so that the Interface and > >>>>>>>>> Implementation are built by differant users > >>>>>>>>> meaning that every user that will built an Interface will also build > >>>>>>>>> his very own Implementation. > >>>>>>>>> and via configuration i will have the service register them. > >>>>>>>>> On Aug 29, 2:48 pm, Krzysztof Koźmic<[email protected]> > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> Can we step back a little? > >>>>>>>>>> What are you trying to do? Container aside. > >>>>>>>>>> On 29/08/2010 9:41 PM, barroei wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> why doesnt it make sense? > >>>>>>>>>>> i want to make the entire service generic. > >>>>>>>>>>> add Interfaces dynamicaly and add the Implementation class that is > >>>>>>>>>>> attached to it. > >>>>>>>>>>> without touching the once that are already registered. > >>>>>>>>>>> there must be an option to do it. > >>>>>>>>>>> is there an option to tell the Implementation class to implement > >>>>>>>>>>> another interface ? > >>>>>>>>>>> and load the interface implementation as a dependency class? > >>>>>>>>>>> On Aug 29, 2:19 pm, Krzysztof Koźmic<[email protected]> > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> This doesn't make any sense. > >>>>>>>>>>>> sent from my HTC Desire > >>>>>>>>>>>> On 29/08/2010 9:16 PM, "barroei"<[email protected]> > >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> i cant use different names. > >>>>>>>>>>>> its the same service. > >>>>>>>>>>>> i want it to have multiple interfaces. > >>>>>>>>>>>> meaning multiple servicecontracts on the same service. > >>>>>>>>>>>> i can easily do it if implement all interfaces by the same class. > >>>>>>>>>>>> but i want it to be generic and have an implementation class per > >>>>>>>>>>>> each > >>>>>>>>>>>> interface > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Aug 29, 10:05 am, Ayende Rahien<[email protected]> > >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> You need different names > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 9:49 AM, > >>>>>>>>>>>>> barroei<[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> hello. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> i am tr... > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]<castle-project-users%2bun[email protected]> > >>>>>>>>>>>> <castle-project-users%2bun[email protected]> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> . > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.-Hidequoted > >>>>>>>>>>>> text - > >>>>>>>>>>>>> - Show quoted text - > >>>>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the > >>>>>>>>>>>> Google Groups > >>>>>>>>>>>> "Castle Project Users" gro...- Hide quoted text - > >>>>>>>>>> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > >>>>>>>> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > >>>>>> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > >>>> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > >> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.
