I have sent an email. Many thanks for looking into it.

On Aug 31, 8:03 pm, Craig Neuwirt <[email protected]> wrote:
> Can you send me sample to demonstrate?
>
> On Aug 30, 2010, at 11:12 PM, Daniel Richardson wrote:
>
>
>
> > Craig,
>
> > Yes, that's the code and the channel is aborted. This however must
> > leave the session attached/active (or something) because after the
> > client then makes 10th consecutive call the next call times out due to
> > exceeding maxConcurrentSessions.
> > The PerformInvocation method in WcfRemotingInterceptor then throws a
> > TimeoutException as the service is no longer responding due to no more
> > sessions being available. A client call cannot be made then until a
> > session times out on the service freeing one up.
> > I can send a simple solution to demonstrate the issue.
>
> > Thanks Daniel
>
> > On Aug 30, 8:03 pm, Craig Neuwirt <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> Hey Daniel,
>
> >>   Isn't the code in question something like
>
> >>                                         try
> >>                                         {
> >>                                                 if (timeout.HasValue)
> >>                                                 {
> >>                                                         
> >> comm.Close(timeout.Value);
> >>                                                 }
> >>                                                 else
> >>                                                 {
> >>                                                         comm.Close();
> >>                                                 }
> >>                                         }
> >>                                         catch
> >>                                         {
> >>                                                 comm.Abort();
> >>                                         }
>
> >> If an exception occurs, the channel should be aborted.  Is there something 
> >> else that needs to be
> >> done to close it properly?
>
> >> thanks,
> >>  craig
>
> >> On Aug 30, 2010, at 1:15 AM, Daniel Richardson wrote:
>
> >>> True, it isn't bubbling up but this means the communication channel
> >>> isn't being closed properly and aborted.
> >>> This in itself wouldn't be too much of a problem but if you have a
> >>> default WCF configuration then for a service the
> >>> maxConcurrentSessions="10". If you then make the same service call
> >>> repeatedly in succession then after the 10th call the WCF service then
> >>> times out due to all the sessions being taken up, due to the channel
> >>> not being successfully released.
> >>> This then is a problem. The maxConcurrentSessions can be increased but
> >>> this isn't correcting the issue.
>
> >>> On Aug 27, 7:37 pm, Craig Neuwirt <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>> Zero is chosen to avoid excessive waiting on disposal.  It is in a 
> >>>> try/catch block so it shouldn't be bubbling up.
>
> >>>> On Aug 27, 2010, at 4:49 AM, Daniel Richardson wrote:
>
> >>>>> The WcfChannelHolder class though doesn't appear to use this value.
> >>>>> Both the RefreshChannel and Dispose method are hardcoded to use
> >>>>> TimeSpan.Zero when calling WcfUtils.ReleaseCommunicationObject??
>
> >>>>> On Aug 27, 1:07 pm, John Simons <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>>> Hi Daniel,
>
> >>>>>> When you add the wcffacility to the container you can specify the 
> >>>>>> timeout:
> >>>>>> container.AddFacility<WcfFacility>(f => f.CloseTimeout = TimeSpan.Zero)
>
> >>>>>> Cheers
> >>>>>> John
>
> >>>>>> ________________________________
> >>>>>> From: Daniel Richardson <[email protected]>
> >>>>>> To: Castle Project Users <[email protected]>
> >>>>>> Sent: Fri, 27 August, 2010 2:28:53 PM
> >>>>>> Subject: WcfIntegration - timeout exception?
>
> >>>>>> Hi,
>
> >>>>>> I am using the WcfIntegration client side to instantiate my services.
> >>>>>> The lifestyle is transient (this is a requirement of my design) so I
> >>>>>> understand that I need to manage the lifecycle of the components. I am
> >>>>>> using the below code to instantiate and call my service (where the
> >>>>>> ComponentContainer is a wrapper around IWindsorContainer).
>
> >>>>>> This however results in a call to the Dispose method on
> >>>>>> WcfChannelHolder, which is throwing an exception due to the call to
> >>>>>> release the communication object...
> >>>>>> WcfUtils.ReleaseCommunicationObject(Channel, TimeSpan.Zero);
> >>>>>> This results in a System.TimeoutException when attempting to close the
> >>>>>> channel.
>
> >>>>>> Why is the timeout set to zero? Is anyone else encountering this
> >>>>>> issue? Can this be made configurable somehow?
>
> >>>>>>     var search = ComponentContainer.Resolve<ISearchService>();
> >>>>>>     try
> >>>>>>     {
> >>>>>>         var result = search.PolicySearch(new PolicySearchRequest
> >>>>>>         {
> >>>>>>             RiskReference = "abc"
> >>>>>>         });
> >>>>>>         System.Console.WriteLine("count: " + result.ResultCount);
> >>>>>>     }
> >>>>>>     finally
> >>>>>>     {
> >>>>>>         ComponentContainer.Release(search);
> >>>>>>     }
>
> >>>>>> Thanks
>
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> >>>>>> Groups
> >>>>>> "Castle Project Users" group.
> >>>>>> To post to this group, send email to 
> >>>>>> [email protected].
> >>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >>>>>> [email protected].
> >>>>>> For more options, visit this group 
> >>>>>> athttp://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.
>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> >>>>> Groups "Castle Project Users" group.
> >>>>> To post to this group, send email to 
> >>>>> [email protected].
> >>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> >>>>> [email protected].
> >>>>> For more options, visit this group 
> >>>>> athttp://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.-Hidequoted 
> >>>>> text -
>
> >>>> - Show quoted text -
>
> >>> --
> >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> >>> "Castle Project Users" group.
> >>> To post to this group, send email to 
> >>> [email protected].
> >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> >>> [email protected].
> >>> For more options, visit this group 
> >>> athttp://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.-Hide quoted 
> >>> text -
>
> >> - Show quoted text -
>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> > "Castle Project Users" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> > [email protected].
> > For more options, visit this group 
> > athttp://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.- Hide quoted 
> > text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Castle Project Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.

Reply via email to