But even if they do, we are not deleting it! All you're proposing is move it to another assembly, not a big deal IMHO.
Cheers John ________________________________ From: Krzysztof Koźmic <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Wed, 22 September, 2010 8:10:40 PM Subject: Re: Moving some facilities out of Castle.Windsor.dll (in v3) Actually last month I stumbled upon a question on StackOverflow about Remoting Facility. I think vast (I mean 99% or more) majority of users don't care about it, hence the idea to move it out. On 22/09/2010 8:03 PM, Valeriu Caraulean wrote: +1 on moving in separate assemblies. > > >And may be it will serve as first step to deprecate Remoting >facility. >I haven't seen in a while discussions/mentions of this facility. >Also, Event Wiring is not too much talked around... > > > > >On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 10:41 AM, xtoff ><[email protected]> wrote: > >regardless of the discussion in the other thread, I'm still >interested >>in your feedback here, so do speak up. >> >>On Sep 22, 2:48 pm, Krzysztof Koźmic <[email protected]> >>wrote: >> >>> Hey, >>> >>> I want to do some rework for Windsor 3, and slim it >>> down a >>>little, and >>> as part of it, I'm considering moving the following >>>facilities out of >>> Windsor.dll to their own assemblies (similar to >>> Synchronize >>>Facility) >>> >>> * Event Wiring facility (because it's not that >>>useful/used) >>> * Remoting Facility (because remoting is de-facto >>>obsolete) >>> * Factory Support (because with UsingFactoryMethod >>> in >>>the fluent API >>> not depending on it, there's no really good >>> reason to >>>use it >>> unless you register stuff via XML) >>> >>> That would mean that only Startable and TypedFactory >>>facilities would >>> still live in Windsor.dll >>> >>> Objections? Thoughts? >>> >>> Krzysztof >> >>-- >>You received this message because you are subscribed to >>the >>Google Groups "Castle Project Users" group. >>To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>[email protected]. >>For more options, visit this group at >>http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en. >> >> > -- >You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >Groups >"Castle Project Users" group. >To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >[email protected]. >For more options, visit this group at >http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.
