"IMHO it's not worth maintaining it." is what I was interested in.
Thanks, -rb From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mauricio Scheffer Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2011 12:57 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Castle's NHibernate Bytecode Provider Yes, I'm well aware of that, but just because it can be done doesn't mean it provides any real value. IMHO it's not worth maintaining it... -- Mauricio On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 4:32 PM, G. Richard Bellamy <[email protected]> wrote: The ProxyFactoryFactory is configurable in NH. This allows the developer to choose whether or not all proxies are generated by the same provider. I'm not sure that's a convincing argument, but there you go. -rb From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mauricio Scheffer Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2011 12:21 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Castle's NHibernate Bytecode Provider Is there any real advantage in using and maintaining the Castle bytecode provider (over the new default one, that is)? If it's worth maintaining, it could be moved to NHibernate.Contrib or as a Castle contrib project. -- Mauricio On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 1:06 PM, G. Richard Bellamy <[email protected]> wrote: I'm curious what the status is of the NH bytecode provider from the Castle perspective (if there is one). From what I've read, the NH team is no longer supporting the various Bytecode providers, and is going with a default of using LinFu for their ProxyFactoryFactory (I guess this really means they're no longer supporting the Spring and Castle bytecode providers). http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers/browse_thread/thread/d22172aec62a2ddd /d6a8898a1204fc8f?lnk=gst <http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers/browse_thread/thread/d22172aec62a2dd d/d6a8898a1204fc8f?lnk=gst&q=bytecode#d6a8898a1204fc8f> &q=bytecode#d6a8898a1204fc8f http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5728622/nhibernate-bytecode-providers-sou rce -rb -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] <mailto:castle-project-users%[email protected]> . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] <mailto:castle-project-users%[email protected]> . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.
