For security with Monorail, I prefer using the IPrincipal and the
PrincipalPermission attribute as detailed by Ayende here:

http://ayende.com/blog/1106/castle-demo-app-viewcomponents-security-filters-and-friends

---
Patrick Steele
http://weblogs.asp.net/psteele



On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 4:32 AM, Carlos <[email protected]> wrote:
> Thank you very much,Mr. Steele.
>
> Your reply really helps me.
>
> I kind of hope the IDynamicActionProvider could be a coordinator for
> my project,dynamically add actions to controllers due to different
> user identity.I read the link in your reply,and seem to me that this
> IDynamicActionProvider thing is some part of a 'Application
> Inialization' that happens way before user can really interact with
> anything in the site.I used to think that this Dynamic Action
> Distribution is a Runtime thing that happens everywhere in the
> lifecycle of the site.
>
> If what I think was right,this IDynamicActionProvider does not support
> hot-plugging, it's main purpose is still Reusing the Actions across
> controllers.Is this Dynamically Adding Actions at Runtime thing
> possible with monorail? Can I achive this by change the Lifecyclestyle
> or any other configurations,or even by writing my own controller
> factory?
>
> Thank you again!
>
>
> On 9月17日, 下午10时22分, Patrick Steele <[email protected]> wrote:
>> From this thread:
>>
>> http://markmail.org/message/o27x3yli6faos2sb#query:+page:1+mid:o27x3y...
>>
>> It sounds like Dynamic Actions are resolved before ASP.NET has
>> provided MonoRail with the associated Session.
>>
>> Instead of conditionally adding the action based on role, I think you
>> may want to change your approach so the role check is done inside the
>> dynamic action code.
>>
>> ---
>> Patrick Steelehttp://weblogs.asp.net/psteele
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 5:19 AM, Carlos <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > Hi, fellows. I'm using monorail ver.1.0.3.00 under .net framework
>> > 2.0.Yes I know the version is outdate,but my virtual host only
>> > supports .net2.0,so I can't just upgrade. Anyway  here' the problem:
>>
>> > I'm trying to add some Dynamic actions to the controller by determine
>> > the user's role in a Session[],this session was created the minute the
>> > user logged in,and for now, it's always created to test the
>> > function.But when I implement the
>> > IDynamicActionProvider.IncludeActions(Controller controller)
>> > function,I try to get the user's role from the
>> > controller.Session[],but due to protection level the
>> > controller.Session[] is not available.So I try to use the
>> > controller.Context.Session[] ,but an null reference exception threw
>> > out.
>>
>> > Is there anyone who know the prolem can tell me why the Session[] is
>> > always null at this place,and how can I get access to the Session[]
>> > inside the IDynamicActionProvider.IncludeActions(Controller
>> > controller) function.
>>
>> > Many thanks.
>>
>> > --
>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> > "Castle Project Users" group.
>> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>> > [email protected].
>> > For more options, visit this group 
>> > athttp://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.- 隐藏被引用文字 -
>>
>> - 显示引用的文字 -
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Castle Project Users" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Castle Project Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.

Reply via email to