Not sure off top of my head. Any chance of duplicating this in a small test so
I can run it?
On Aug 28, 2012, at 7:27 AM, Hanno wrote:
> Hy,
> we are facing a problem when using WcfFacility on the client side with a
> Service which is derived from a common base interface.
>
> This is a part of our base interface:
>
> [ServiceContract]
> public interface IEditableService<TEntity>
> {
> [OperationContract]
> IEnumerable<TEntity> SaveAndReturn(IEnumerable<TEntity> entities);
> }
>
>
> Our Service will then extend the base interface and provide additional
> operations:
>
> [ServiceContract]
> public interface IInstallationService: IEditableService<Installation>
> {
> ... some additional operations go here
> }
>
> Part of the WSDL after deploying the IInstallationService on IIS:
>
> <wsdl:operation name="SaveAndReturn">
> <wsdl:input
> wsaw:Action="http://tempuri.org/IEditableServiceOf_Installation/SaveAndReturn";
> message="tns:IInstallationService_SaveAndReturn_InputMessage"/>
> <wsdl:output
> wsaw:Action="http://tempuri.org/IEditableServiceOf_Installation/SaveAndReturnResponse";
> message="tns:IInstallationService_SaveAndReturn_OutputMessage"/>
> </wsdl:operation>
>
>
> When using a Service Reference generated by VS everything seems fine and the
> Service is workable with the generated class.
> Part of generated Reference.cs:
>
> [System.ServiceModel.OperationContractAttribute(Action="http://tempuri.org/IEditableServiceOf_Installation/SaveAndReturn";,
>
> ReplyAction="http://tempuri.org/IEditableServiceOf_Installation/SaveAndReturnResponse";)]
> System.Collections.Generic.List<Installation>
> SaveAndReturn(System.Collections.Generic.List<Installation> entities);
>
>
> But when using the WcfFacility on the client side the Dynamic Proxy generated
> by Castle will produce invalid Soap requests and we get the following error:
>
> The message with Action
> 'http://tempuri.org/IEditableService_x0060_1/SaveAndReturn' cannot be
> processed at the receiver, due to a ContractFilter mismatch at the
> EndpointDispatcher. This may be because of either a contract mismatch
> (mismatched Actions between sender and receiver) or a binding/security
> mismatch between the sender and the receiver. Check that sender and receiver
> have the same contract and the same binding (including security requirements,
> e.g. Message, Transport, None).
>
> Note the strange part in the action. Instead of the expected
> 'IEditableServiceOf_Installation' we get 'IEditableService_x0060_1'.
>
> Any idea why the action is malformed when we are using WcfFacility?
>
>
> Regards,
> Hanno
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Castle Project Users" group.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/castle-project-users/-/0ksLJZJGKWQJ.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Castle Project Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.
