That could be useful
Sent from my IPad
--
Krzysztof Kozmic
On Monday, 3 September 2012 at 6:35 PM, Asger Hallas wrote:
> Thanks a lot!
>
> Unless I'm doing it wrong, it still seems like a lot of code though, when
> used with generic interfaces:
>
> container.Register(Classes.FromThisAssembly().BasedOn(typeof
> (CommandExecutor<>))
> .ConfigureIf(registration =>
> registration.Implementation.GetInterfaces().Any(x => x.IsGenericType &&
> x.GetGenericTypeDefinition() == typeof (IHandleMessages<>)),
> registration =>
> {
> var genericArgument =
> registration.Implementation.GetInterfaces()
> .First(y =>
> y.GetGenericTypeDefinition() == typeof (IHandleMessages<>))
>
> .GetGenericArguments()[0];
>
>
> registration.Forward(typeof
> (IHandleMessages<>).MakeGenericType(genericArgument));
> })
> .WithService.Base().LifestyleTransient(),
> Classes.FromThisAssembly().BasedOn(typeof
> (IHandleMessages<>)).WithService.Base().LifestyleTransient());
>
>
> Would it be meaningful to support multiple BasedOn or'ed together? Would you
> accept a patch?
>
> //Asger
> On Friday, 31 August 2012 23:17:56 UTC+2, Krzysztof Koźmic wrote:
> > you can do it by saying (pseudo-syntax)
> >
> > Register.BasedOn<A>.ConfigureIf<B>(Forward<B>)
> > Register.BasedOn<B>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Krzysztof Kozmic
> >
> >
> > On Saturday, 1 September 2012 at 12:04 AM, Asger Hallas wrote:
> >
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > I guess this is actually a feature request - or maybe I just don't get
> > > how to do it right.
> > >
> > > I wonder if it would be possible to:
> > > Register all types based on one generic interfaces and then all types
> > > based on another generic interface - and have windsor register both
> > > generic interfaces as services for the types that implements both?
> > >
> > > Thus having Windsor aggregate services for the component if the same type
> > > is registered with several services?
> > >
> > > I originally posted a stackoverflow question about my actual problem
> > > here:
> > > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/12111502/registering-the-same-classes-with-two-services-in-two-steps-in-castle-windso
> > >
> > > But I have not had so much luck with it :)
> > >
> > > Can you tell me, if I need to do it otherwise - and if the feature of
> > > unioning services from multiple registrations of the same type actually
> > > could make sense?
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Asger
> > >
> > > --
> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > > "Castle Project Users" group.
> > > To view this discussion on the web visit
> > > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/castle-project-users/-/6xZdNN8hHycJ.
> > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> > > (javascript:).
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > [email protected] (javascript:).
> > > For more options, visit this group at
> > > http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.
> >
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Castle Project Users" group.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/castle-project-users/-/ST6IpbnjeDcJ.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> (mailto:[email protected]).
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]
> (mailto:[email protected]).
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Castle Project Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.
