I don't think there's a switch that controls that (Craig may have some input
here)
I think if you want that you might need to override some logic in the facility
--
Krzysztof Kozmic
On Monday, 1 April 2013 at 6:22 AM, Konstantin wrote:
> lets say I have some service contract
>
> [ServiceContract]
> public interface ISecurityProvider
> {
> [OperationContract]
> void DoSomething();
> }
>
>
> following code throws exception:
> Castle.MicroKernel.Facilities.FacilityException : The client model requires
> an endpoint.
>
> WindsorContainer container=new WindsorContainer();
> container.AddFacility<WcfFacility>();
> var p=container.Resolve<ISecurityProvider>();
>
>
>
> It is convinient when WCF is configured in app.config. In my case app listens
> topic in messageing to get the address where and how to access service. So
> when container is initially configured service contracts should not be
> resolvable.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Castle Project Users" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected]
> (mailto:[email protected]).
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> (mailto:[email protected]).
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Castle Project Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-users?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
