Keith,
What is the reason for ComplexType implementing ContentModelGroup. It seems
to me that a ComplexType is not a ContentModelGroup per se, but it may
contain one (or none). The reason I ask is that as far as I can tell from
the spec(Part1:Structures, sec 3.4,3.4.1,3.4.2), a complex type can have
only 0 or 1 ContentModel (seq,all,choice). Because ComplexType implements
ContentModelGroup, it would be possible to construct a ComplexType object in
Castor with multiple groups which should not be allowed. Shouldn't
ComplexType just have a single member var of type Group (or Particle)?
Thanks,
Matt
-----------------------------------------------------------
If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of:
unsubscribe castor-dev
