Hi Matt,
I'll take a look at upgrading the SchemaWriter and adding the additional
namespace resolution you mentioned below. Keep in mind however that the
SchemaWriter is currently not supported. I only hacked it together for
testing purposes, which is why you need to explicitly enable it's usage.
:-)
Thanks,
--Keith
Matt Small wrote:
>
> I think that there needs to be some way to associate a namespace reference
> to an XMLType object. In particular, when you construct a Schema and assign
> a TypeReference to an element such as "xsd:string", if you need to get the
> type back from the ElementDecl, the namespace reference is stripped and you
> just get a StringType object. There is no way to get the namespace
> reference from the TypeReference because this class is package private. It
> also seems like I should be able to create complex types and associate them
> to particular namespaces.
>
> This problem actually shows itself in the SchemaWriter class.
>
> If I load the following schema
>
> <?xml version="1.0"?>
> <xsd:schema xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema";
> targetNamespace="http://www.test.com/test/test";>
> <xsd:element name="test" type="testType"/>
> <xsd:complexType name="testType">
> <xsd:sequence>
> <xsd:element name="test1" type="xsd:string"/>
> <xsd:element name="test2" type="xsd:string"/>
> </xsd:sequence>
> </xsd:complexType>
> </xsd:schema>
>
> And then use SchemaWriter to write it back it gets written as:
>
> <?xml version="1.0"?>
> <xsd:schema xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema";
> targetNS="http://www.test.com/test/test";>
> <xsd:element name="test" type="testType"/>
> <xsd:complexType name="testType">
> <xsd:sequence>
> <xsd:element name="test1" type="string"/>
> <xsd:element name="test2" type="string"/>
> </xsd:sequence>
> </xsd:complexType>
> </xsd:schema>
>
> Note that if you then try to reload the generated schema, Castor will give
> the error "getSimpleType: the simple type 'string' has not been declared in
> XML Schema namespace."
>
> Has anyone else run into this problem? Does anybody know of any good
> workarounds? I had to hack schema writer and use the isBuiltInType method to
> work around this:
>
> if (type instanceof SimpleType &&
> ((SimpleType)type).isBuiltInType()){
> if (type.getName() != null) {
> //System.out.println("type name
> isn't null, it's: " + type.getName());
> _atts.addAttribute("type", null,
> "xsd:"+type.getName());
> }else
> hasAnonymousType = true;
> }else{
> //System.out.println("Its not a reference,
> type is " + type);
> if (type.getName() != null) {
> //System.out.println("type name
> isn't null, it's: " + type.getName());
> _atts.addAttribute("type", null,
> type.getName());
> }else
> hasAnonymousType = true;
> }
>
> also, SchemaWriter should be updated to print "targetNamespace" not
> "targetNS"
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of:
> unsubscribe castor-dev
-----------------------------------------------------------
If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of:
unsubscribe castor-dev
