I
evaluated both Visual BSF and FrontierSuite before we finally choose
Castor ( actually also JDX, ModelMothods, ObjectDriver, ObjectSpark,
ObjectBridge, Cocobase etc. ). Most products are far away from what Castor
can do, or going too far to EJB world, only Visual BSF is
close.
Now
Castor is running in our Beta products over WebLogic 6.1sp1,
performance is very good, no complaint at all. We fixed several issues regarding
Oracle Connection Pool by using CVS version of Castor and WLS
6.1sp1.
-
Alex
-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Holmes (ENZ) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 1:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [castor-dev] Anyone know of any performance issues with Casto r?...especially whether Visual BSF or FrontierSuite (persistJ) might be a lot better all round. BTW anyone used either of those? (But the cost is a big problem for us...)Cheers,R :)-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Holmes (ENZ) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:51 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [castor-dev] Anyone know of any performance issues with Castor?Guys -
We're still evaluating Castor and are wondering if anyone has found any places where Castor's performance is a bit slow and can't be worked around. I can see that basic operations like loading and saving seem to work quite quickly, but it would be good to hear about anyone else's experience.
