Depends a lot on how you're measuing. I found that initial calls to Castor
are slow, but as the caching of introspection data happens, and as HotSpot
gets a chance to do it's magic, I get load/update cycle times around the
order of 6ms for relatively complex objects.
-Mark
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris Cook" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2001 10:42 AM
Subject: [castor-dev] Performance
>
>
> I have recently downloaded and started to use Castor for a project. We
had
> in place a set of code to simulate a piece of our system, and measure the
> inserts per second into the database. Using straight JDBC we usually
> measure about 175 ins/s into the database. With Castor doing the
> persistence, we measure about 40 ins/s. Does this figure seem right to
you
> all? Does Castor average about 4 or 5 times slower than straight JDBC?
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of:
> unsubscribe castor-dev
>
>
-----------------------------------------------------------
If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of:
unsubscribe castor-dev
