[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Very good points here, Walter. People have complained about this
> > type of stuff before, but nobody has ever provided any updates/fixes
> > for the codebase.
>
> Hi Bruce,
>
> My last email does have a change attached to it. It probably should
> be refactored more, but this seemed the easiest for people to add
> (not knowing if it would make it into the code base)
>
> I should note that the code was based on the snapshot from last night
> (2001-11-25) and not directly from cvs (currently not external cvs
> access :-( ).
>
Walt,
Thanks for the code, but it would be much easier if you could provide it
in patch format. Not only is it far easier to apply to the codebase (I
don't need to pick though it by hand), but it has a much higher
possiblity of being accepted by Thomas (primary Castor developer). If
you'd like me to create a patch for you, please send me the entire file
that you've changed and I'll do so.
Bruce
-----------------------------------------------------------
If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of:
unsubscribe castor-dev
