I'm having problem marshalling, and not sure why. I know that java primitives default to "attribute", but it appears that you can override that behaviour by explicitly specifying them (correct?). I have the following mapping:
<class name="com.intrinity.instore.castor.UserImpl" identity="id" key-generator="SEQUENCE">
<description>User</description>
<cache-type type="none" />
<map-to table="users" xml="user" />
<field name="id" type="integer">
<sql name="id" type="integer" />
<xml name="id" node="attribute" />
</field>
<field name="name" type="string">
<sql name="name" type="varchar" dirty="ignore" />
<xml name="name" node="text" />
</field>
<field name="password" type="string">
<sql name="password" type="varchar" dirty="ignore" />
<xml name="password" node="element" />
</field>
<field name="isGroup" type="boolean">
<sql name="isgroup" type="bit" dirty="ignore" />
<xml name="is_group" node="element" />
</field>
<field name="isActive" type="boolean">
<sql name="active" type="bit" dirty="ignore" />
<xml name="is_active" node="element" />
</field>
<field name="createdBy" type="integer">
<sql name="createdby" type="integer" dirty="ignore" />
<xml name="created_by" node="element" />
</field>
<field name="created" type="date">
<sql name="created" type="timestamp" dirty="ignore" />
<xml name="created" node="element" />
</field>
<field name="updatedBy" type="integer">
<sql name="updatedby" type="integer" dirty="ignore" />
<xml name="updated_by" node="element" />
</field>
<field name="updated" type="date">
<sql name="updated" type="timestamp" dirty="check" />
<xml name="updated" node="element" />
</field>
</class>
and it generates the following xml:
<user-impl id="8" is-active="true" created-by="2" updated-by="8" is-group="false">
<created>2001-09-13T12:01:23.000</created>
<updated>2001-10-14T12:04:55.000</updated>
<name>Bob</name>
<password>bob</password>
</user-impl>
To be very specific, is-active, created-by, updated-by and is-group should be elements (id is correct, I wanted attribute). Also, I wanted name to be a text element inside <user-impl> (I believe it is possible to have text at same level as element, correct?).
Thanks to whoever can assist,
Trevor D. Cook
