Thank for the reminder. Almost forgot about it.
Thomas
-----Original Message-----
>From: Dmitri Colebatch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Sunday, December 02, 2001 4:41 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [castor-dev] Castor 0.9.4 and Next Release information
>
>Hi,
>
>I missed this message initially, so forgive the late response. As a
>non-developer, I'm going to try and tread carefully, but forgive me if I
>do not.
>
>I've asked a couple of times about the OQLEnumeration static class in
>OQLQueryImpl (org.exolab.castor.jdo.engine) with regard to it being
>static, and wondering if I'm trying to bend castor too far, or if there is
>room for making it non-static. Useful references to the issue are:
>
>http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg01671.html - the
>start of one thread on it.
>
>http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg02657.html - Thomas
>saying he'd try and look at it (Thomas I am sure you are busy, and your
>work on castor is much appreciated, I assume you haven't had a chance to
>look at this as yet?).
>
>in short, the finalizer for OQLQueryImpl closes the query and the results,
>meaning that if you have a reference to the results, without having a
>reference to the query, then you could find yourself with a closed set of
>results. my suggestion is to make OQLEnumeration non-static, so that the
>reference to the results will prevent the QQLQueryImpl being garbage
>collected.
>
>cheers,
>dim
>
>-----------------------------------------------------------
>If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of:
> unsubscribe castor-dev
>
-----------------------------------------------------------
If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of:
unsubscribe castor-dev
