Hi Gil,
It looks to me that DSML support will eventually be dropped, unless we
get a contributor who is interested in working on it. Currently none of
the current contributors work on it, except maybe Thomas, but since his
time is extremely limited I don't think he will do much on it in the
future.
Basically we can only support what the contributors want to work on.
If you (or anyone for that matter) are interested in working on DSML
support, please e-mail Thomas Yip and let him know (his e-mail appears
in the contributors page).
Thanks,
--Keith
Gilbert Pilz wrote:
>
> This a program management type question more than a technical question. I
> was wondering what the anticipated level of support for Castor DSML will be
> in the future? If the Castor project intends to eventually drop support for
> DSML I would like to know sooner rather than later so that I can start the
> search for a suitable replacement. I don't mean to sound critical or
> negative about this. I can understand that, as projects evolve, certain
> features become more important and others less important. I can't help but
> notice that I am the only person in the last month who has posted anything
> to this list concerning DSML. If nobody is using DSML, then why support it?
> I just need to know is all . . .
>
> - gil
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of:
> unsubscribe castor-dev
-----------------------------------------------------------
If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of:
unsubscribe castor-dev
