Hi Glen and Bruce Thanks for your feedback regarding the comparison chart.
I have incorporated both your feedback and update the chart to my best knowledge. Changes Done: - modified the title to reflect more accurately what is the chart about - added in the column for Object Bridge, however I don't have enough information at this moment. - added broad categories Database Support, Tools Support, Mapping Features New Features List - Latest Version - Query Language Support - Two-Phase Commit - Multiple Database - Large ResultSet Cursoring - GUI Mapping Tool - Polymorphic Loading - Self Referential Relation - Large Object Support - m:n Relationship Regarding Castor JDO, I'm not sure of the following things: - Multiple database? At the mapping level, I assumed it is possible to indicate the mappings for different databases. However, at the source code level, is it possible to manage transactions across different databases ? - Am I correct to say that self-referencing is not supported in Castor? - Is m:n relationship supported in Castor? ========== Ian Lim email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] homepage: http://www.webappcabaret.com/mallim ----- Original Message ----- From: "Glen Lewis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 01:32 PM Subject: Re: [castor-dev] Feature Comparison Chart Torque, Castor, JRF > Excellent work. I'd like to see comparison of some of the > features like handling inheritance, one-to-many, > many-to-many, proxy objects, etc. I know that Castor does > all but the proxy objects, but until I saw your chart, > didn't even realize the others existed. > > Thanks! > -Glen > ----------------------------------------------------------- If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of: unsubscribe castor-dev
