Hi,
   I read the archives and found that one of the ways requires writing of
  a field handler. I wrote a field handler and corresponding field descriptor
  and also a class descriptor where this field is used.
     However I find no difference in the output generated. In my case
  the output for representation for hashMap is same as was in the default
  behavior. In fact after following the explanation given in the archives
  I get the the same object in the key and value in the hashtable.
 
    I am specifying the inoformation for field descriptor in the falling way
      <field name="hashTab"
               collection="hashtable">
               <bind-xml name="castor.HashTabFieldDescriptor" node="element"/>
      </field>
 
   Please let me know if I am missing something or doing something wrong.
 
  Thanks.
 
Regards,
Uddhav

Reply via email to