Thomas, can I just reconfirm that I actually read your email correctly.
a) No new features will be accepted on the JDO side of things for the 0.9.4 release. b) Existing bugs will be fixed for the 0.9.4 release, including the bug mentioned futher below (support for foreign keys in multi-field identities, that is). Thanks Werner Thomas Yip wrote: > I don't think we have timeframe for 0.9.4 yet. > But, unless 0.9.4 release very late, I would guess there would > have no major feature from now to 0.9.4 on the JDO side. > > Sorry, we're lacking of resource. > > Thomas > > -----Original Message----- > >From: Werner Guttmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 8:52 AM > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: [castor-dev] Plea for info on Castor JDO 0.9.4! ;-) > > > >Hi, > > > >I'm really, really keen (and I am sure others are too) to have a list of > >key features that will appear in the next release of Castor JDO, and a > >finger-in-the-air estimate of when the next release will be available. > >Can anyone provide this information? Even a rough idea would be much > >appreciated... > > > >More particularly, I'd be really keen to see an answer to the below > >email I sent about three days ago to this mailing list as it poses a > >serious risk to our project. > > > >Many thanks, > >Werner Guttmann > > > >-------- Original Message -------- > >Subject: [castor-dev] 1:m relations and multi-field identities > >Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2002 11:18:13 +0000 > >From: Werner Guttmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Organization: Morgan Stanley > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >Hi, > > > >can somebody please educate me on the subject of problems with > >multi-field identities in 1:m relations where on of the identity fields > >is a foreign key. As far as I remember, the situation is as follows: > > > >Castor does support 1:m relations, but it does not support 1:m relations > >with multi-field identities where one of the fields is a foreign key. > > > >Is this statement correct, and if so, is there anybody who knows when > >this missing feature will be supported. I do remember emails that > >referred to the on-going refactoring being the main reason for this not > >being implemented yet. Is this still correct, and if so, can anybody > >provide an estimate on when this functionality will be available? > > > >Thanks > >Werner Guttmann > > > >----------------------------------------------------------- > >If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of: > > unsubscribe castor-dev > > > >----------------------------------------------------------- > >If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of: > > unsubscribe castor-dev > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of: > unsubscribe castor-dev ----------------------------------------------------------- If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of: unsubscribe castor-dev
