Have
you try to setAutoStore( true )?
It
will create reachable independent object
automatically.
Remember
to call it before you start the
transaction
Thomas
-----Original
Message-----
>From: Bert van Brakel
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 2:11
AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [castor-dev] New child
objects in m:n relation not created in Persistent storage when creating new
parent
>
>Unfortunately I think so too. Permissions are seperate
entities in storage. I want them created automatically, but not deleted. I
can't make permissions dependent for that reason.
>
>Oh well, I'll have to live with it then, unless anyone
else has any bright ideas.
>
>Bert
>----- Original Message -----
>>From: Christopher
Sturm
>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 2:16
PM
>>Subject: Re: [castor-dev] New child
objects in m:n relation not created in Persistent storage when creating new
parent
>>
>>I think your Permission class
should depend on your Role class in the mapping.
>>
>><class name="Permission "
identity="id">
>> <field
name="role" type="Role">
>>
</field>
>>
</class>
>>
>> <class name="Role"
identity="id" depends="Permission">
>> <field
name="permission" type="Permission">
>> </field>
>>
</class>
>>
>>Otherwise you need to create the
Permission objects first and then create your Role.
>>-----Original
Message-----
>>From: Bert van Brakel
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 5:01
PM
>>To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Subject: [castor-dev] New child objects
in m:n relation not created in Persistent storage when creating new
parent
>>Why does castor not create new child
objects in persistent storage when I create a new parent
object?
>>
>>Example code:
>>
db.begin();
>> Permission perm1 =
new Permission( "perm1" );
>> Permission perm2 =
new Permission( "perm2" );
>> Role role = new
Role();
>> role.add( perm1
);
>> role.add( perm2
);
>> db.create( role );
<------
>>
db.commit();
>>
>>Public methods:
>> The class Permission
has get/set Name and Id (String)
>> Role also has
get/set Name and Id (String), and get/set Permissions
(Collection)
>>Relationships:
>> The Permission class
is not dependant on Role.
>> There is a m:n
relationship between the Role and Permission classes.
>>
>>All works OK if I create the
permissions first in persistence storage, using a UUID key-genarator (for both
Permission and Role), then retrieve the permissions from storage and add them
to the role. Mapping between Role and Permission works OK.
>>
>>However things don't work fine if I add
new permissions to role without first creating them in the persistent storage.
Is there a way I can get castor to do this without making Permissions
dependant on Role?
>>
>>Maybe castor can't do this
yet?
>>
>>Any help is much
appreciated.
>>Thanks,
>>Bert.
>>
>