Why can't castor map them using the same setup as a many-to-many relationship? In this case though one of the columns (parent identifier) in the mapping table would be unique.
Surely that can't be impossible to do? Or can't this be executed in one sql statement? Bert. ----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 1:14 PM Subject: Re: [castor-dev] Composite Object Caching > Brad Clow wrote: > > > > u might be interested in this thread: > > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg02882.html > > > > in a one-to-many, the child must have a reference to the parent, but the > > parent doesn't require a reference to the child. > > > > Brad, > > Thank you for finding that thread. This is why my earlier post states, > "In most situations, Castor requires that relations be mapped as > bi-directional." I was referring to just these types of situations. > > Bruce > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of: > unsubscribe castor-dev _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com ----------------------------------------------------------- If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of: unsubscribe castor-dev
